Laserfiche WebLink
�I t <br /> LLN AR69I0D Close Our wrf(a-tM Rosen, Oss sxxaeen at Afix2017 <br /> the only instinnionahland use earth in Table 2 that was applicable to the Eastern GSA was 10 <br /> prevent water supply use/consumption of contaminated ground water until ground water cleanup <br /> standards were act. <br /> By July of2005, the concentrations of all individual VOC COCs had ken reduced to below <br /> their ground water cleanup standards in all fustian GSA wells. In February 2007, the Eastern <br /> GSA mound water extraction and treatment system was shut down and placed on standby with <br /> regulatory concurrence. VOC concentrations in ground water were monitored from February 2007 <br /> until February 2012 to verifytlmt concentrations did not rebound above cleanup standards. Post- <br /> shutdown VOC rebound monitoring results are discussed in Section 4. 1'rmn 1991 to 2007, over <br /> 300 million gallons of eastern GSA around water were extracted and treated. Table 3 presents <br /> historical maximum and current maximum VOC Coe concentrations in Eastern GSA around <br /> water monitor wells compound to te h MCL cleanup standards. <br /> Cleanup progress for the Porters GSA and treatment facility compliance monitoring results <br /> n reported in quarterly GSA compliance reports until the second semester of2005; after which <br /> it was regard semiannually in the Site 300 Compliance Monitoring Repots. A list of documents <br /> relevant to the Eastern GSA CERCLA renushatiun, including the compliance organs, is included <br /> as Appendix B. <br /> 2.7. Onsite Inspcef rraw <br /> Tbere is continuous presence of Site 300 Enviranmenlal pragmatism Pmgmm staff at Site 300 <br /> that impeded: (I) the extraction wciffbAd and treatment facilities weekly, and (2) the monitoring <br /> wellfield during sampling activities. The Site 300 Environmental Restoration Pmgmm conducts <br /> selfassessment inspections of facilities and DOE conducts quarterly inspections of nmedietion <br /> activities at Site 300. DOE also conducts inspections as part of the Five YearReview process. <br /> no RWQCB RPM performs site inspections twice a year, and FPA and DISC RPMs perform <br /> Periodic site inspections. Issues and deficiencies observed during assessments are tracked from <br /> inception to resolution using the institutional Issues Tracking System and reported in the semi- <br /> nual Compliance Monitoring Reports. Tk EPA performed their construction completion <br /> inspection as July 13, 2005. <br /> 2.8, Community Involvement <br /> All CERCI .A documents related to me GSA OU have been placed in the LLNI. Site 300 <br /> CERCLA Administrative Record file. These documents were also placed in the Information <br /> Repositories located in the LLNL Discovery Center in Livermore, California and in the Tracy <br /> Public Library in Tracy, California. n addition, electronic topics of the GSA CERCLA <br /> documents issued after 1995 were posted online to allow for easier public access. <br /> As discussed in Section 2.3, a proposed Plan for Environmental Cleanup of the GSA OU was <br /> issued in 1996 for the public to review and comment on the remedial alternatives and purposed <br /> cleanup remedy and standards. A Public Meeting was held on April N, Hour during which DOE <br /> and LLNL summarized information presented in the GSA Feasibility Sandy and Proposal Plan, <br /> and public comments and concerns were recorded. Public comments received at the Public <br /> Meeting and in writing were considered by DOE and the regulffiary agencies in the selection of <br /> the fund cleanup remedy and cleanup starrdards, and were addressed in the Responsiveness <br />