Laserfiche WebLink
� 1 <br /> UNL-AR-00188 core Wpwjs -Cascara„saran wsnnn,f,.xaffinMar ApH12016 <br /> 1. Introduction <br /> I.I. Purpose <br /> This 'Technical Mennommdu n describes the activities and results of the characterization of <br /> scativolatile organic compounds (SVUCsypolycyclic a c hydrocarbons (PAlls) and <br /> polychlorinated hiphenyls (PCBs) in subsurface soil in the vicinity of the debris burial trenches <br /> In the Eastern General Services Area (GSA) portion or the GSA Operable Unit (Olt 1) at <br /> Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory U.LNL) Site 300. The locations of Site 300 and the <br /> GSA OU am shown in Figure 1 . <br /> In June 2013, the U.S. Department of EmergyMational Nuclear Security Administration <br /> (DOENNSA) submitted the "Daft Final Close Gut Report far the Eastern GSA Subarea of OU <br /> 1" (Dibley and Ferry, 2013) to document completion of romdiation. At the July 18, 2013 <br /> Remedial Project Managed s (RPM) Moring, the U.S. Environmental confection Agency (EPA) <br /> and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board U WQCB) indicated that they left that <br /> there were data gaps for SVOCSIPAHs and PCBs in subsurface soil in the vicinity of the debris <br /> burial trenches that needed to he addressed. The EPA indicated that the lack of sampling for <br /> SVOCVPAHs and PCBs in subsurface soil during fire mmnflati0n investigation of the debris <br /> burial mcmhes indicated a data gap because: <br /> 1. The EPA Guidance for conducting Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Studies for <br /> Landfills indicates that analyses should be taken from Re recent Compound List and <br /> Target Acolyte List, which include SVOCs and PAITS <br /> 2. Solvents may have been used by the ernes shops to remove machining or cutting oils and <br /> cutting oils historically contained PCBs. <br /> The RWQCB expressed concern that, although SVUCs and PCBs have never been detected <br /> in Eas1em GSA ground water, if these constituents were associated with the craft shop debris <br /> buried to the touches, they might impact ground water in the future. The U.S. EPA and tie <br /> RWQCB indicated that they would not consider closure of the Easter GSA site until these data <br /> gaps were closed. Therefore, DOE/NNSA agreed to collect additional subsurface soil samples <br /> from the Eastern GSA debris burial trenches for SVOC/PAII and PCB analysis to determine if <br /> these constituents am present, and it present, to deastr ine whether or not the concentrations of <br /> these cons imena could impact ground water above Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCIs). <br /> A Work Plan for these chamc[erimtion activities van submitted and approved by the U.S. <br /> EPA, California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DISC), and the RWQCB — Central <br /> Valley Region (Ferry et al., 2014). In September 2014, the LLNL Environmental Restoration <br /> Department (ERE) conducted this wade for the OOPJ SA in accordance with the approved <br /> Work Plan and other existing procedures developed for LLNL's ongoing Site 300 assessment <br /> and site cleanup under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and <br /> liability Act (CERCLA). <br />