Laserfiche WebLink
and an overflow pond cam of the sewage pond. Debris burial trenches, Wal were used to dispose <br /> of craft shop debris in the I WAs and early 1970s, are located immediately north or the overflow, <br /> pond. Other structures Present in the pastern GSA include former ground water extraction and <br /> coo wells and a ground water treatment system that were used to extract, monitor, and treat <br /> contaminated <br /> coed ground water prior to the achievement of cleanup standards in 2007. There are <br /> also several dim rinds N the area ram were mnsnucmd 10 averts the sewage and overflow pond, <br /> and treatment facility and extraction wellfield. The current bond use in the Fxstern GSA is <br /> industrial. The Eastern GSA, as well as mom of Site 300, has also been designated as critical <br /> habitat for protected wildlife resources. ORsie property adjacent to the Easton GSA includes <br /> Privately owned rangeland and a residence to the south, and an ecological preserve owned by the <br /> California Department of fish and Wildlife. <br /> Evidence of a chemical refuse to ground water in the GSA was f t discovered to 19H2 <br /> when tricblomnthylene ('IVE) was noticed in Wei] 7, a former onsite Site 300 water-supply well <br /> located in the Central GSA. Further investigations led to the discovery and investigation of <br /> real other release areas in the GSA, including the debris burial trenches in the Eastern GSA. <br /> In ti the 1960s and Vyift volatile organic compound (VOC)-contaminated debris was buried in <br /> riches located in the Fasters GSA causing VOC contamination orground water and subsurface <br /> sail (figure 3). <br /> In 1991, ground water extraction and treatment began in the pastern GSA as a ma-mre- <br /> critical <br /> signed H Depen l I In wilitynAgreement IDEA)EPA, <br /> furr the clea California <br /> up of I.LNICSite and <br /> 300. The Sit, <br /> DOE <br /> Wide Remedial Investigation report was issued in Pool, billowed by the Feasibility Study for the <br /> GSA OU and Proposed Plan fur Environmental Cleanup ofthe GSA OU. An OU specific ROD <br /> fur the GSA OU was signed in January 19W. <br /> The Remedial Design for the GSA OU was issued is 1998. Remedial action construction <br /> completion coos documented in June 2005. EPA performed a construction completion inspection <br /> on July 13, 2005. Five Year Reviews were completed in 2001 (Ferry cl a1„ 2001b 2006 (Dibley <br /> ct al., 2006). and 2011 (Valmt m al., 2011). <br /> RemMietion eflhrls in the pas m GSA successfully reduced concentrations of VGCs in <br /> ground water to below the cleanup standards set in the GSA ROD, and the Cast" GSA ground <br /> water extraction <br /> and treatment system was shut off on February 15, 2007 with regulatory <br /> approval. As required by the GSA ROD, ground water monitoring was conducted for five years <br /> after shutdown to determine if VOf: commanmtions would rise or "rebound' above cleanup <br /> standards. The results of the monitoring, which confirmed that VOC concentrations had <br /> remained below cleanup standards in the five-year post shutdown monitoring period, were <br /> Prevented at the February U, 2012 RPM Meeting. The regulatory agencies agreed fat cleating <br /> Of the Eastern GSA was complete, monitoring and reporting could cease, and that close out <br /> documentation should Issmanihed <br /> Draft and Dmfl Final Close Out Reports, documenting [teal remediation of the Eastern GSA <br /> Portion of the GSA OU had been completed, were submitted to the regulatory agencies in <br /> December 2012 and June 2013, respectively. As discussed in Section 1 .1, following submittal of <br /> the Utah Final Close Out Report in June 2013, EPA and the R WQCR requested and DOE agreed <br /> to collect additional subsurface soil samples fora the Entries GSA debris burial much area for <br /> SVOSYPAI I and FUR analysis 0 detention if these constituents are present, and if present, <br />