Laserfiche WebLink
LIN,,AR-580188 7ech MV.mft"' eaa.ere ea on fs„bcnl� soil in de AlorU2016 <br /> 322. Ground Water Sampling <br /> following the detmdion of low concentrations of PCBs in some soil samples collected film <br /> the bomholes, DOE/LLNL collected gmund water samples fir laboratory analysis for PCBs <br /> (EPA Method 80g2A) him nine nearby monitor wells. These wogs included: <br /> • W-26R-01, -04, and -06 and W-25N-24, Sampled on December 3, 2014, <br /> W-26N-0'/ and -Hand W-TP, sampled on Dewmber 4, 2014, and <br /> • W-25N-01 and W-26R-03 sampled on December 8, 2014. <br /> An attempt to sample well W-26R-05 on December 3, M14 was unsuccessful due to <br /> msuficienl water. <br /> All the wells am located in the vicinity of the fallen OSA debris burial trenches, with the <br /> exception Orwell W-]P. This well is located in the vicinity of debris burial trench g3, located in <br /> the Central GSA. The sampling of wall W-yP was sampled to determine if PCBs may have been <br /> released to ground water from this Central OSA debris burial humcM1. <br /> Ground water samples were collected in accordance with LLNL ERD SOP 2.3 and 2.4 <br /> (Sampling Monitor Wells with Bladder Pumps, Electrical Submersible Pumps and Specific- <br /> Depth Gmb Sampling Devices and Sampling Monitor Wells with a Bailer). All samples were <br /> collected in I-liter amber glass bottles that were marked and labeled (location, date/time, emJ <br /> and capped for laboratory analysis. I Ipon collection, the samples were placed in an ice chest to <br /> maintain the required V C temperature. At the end of curb day, the he chests containing <br /> samples collected that day and accompanying ch tin. f-custody documentation were transferred <br /> ill a of for transport to the BE Lubomtones (Bakersfield CA). Sample control and <br /> documentation were conducted in accordance with the prossal described in Appendix A of <br /> me Work Plan (Pmry d aL, 2014). Analytical sample chains.,fcomedy and the analytical <br /> mnple illegally logbooks were handled recording to I.I.NL SOP 4.2 (Goodrich and Lorena, <br /> 2012). Samples firm these, nine wells along with a QA/QC duplicate sample were arely7sx] for <br /> PCBS using EPA Method gOb2A. The PCB analytic results tot the routine and duplicate QC <br /> ground water samples are discussed in Section 4. <br /> 3.3. Contamination Control and Sampling Equipment Decontamination <br /> Procedures <br /> Contamination control procedures, outlined in laboratory specific IWSs, were followed to <br /> prevent contamination of facilities and persmmeL To control potential contamination, auger <br /> Wings were placed on plastic sheeting adjacent to the borehole during drilling and sampling <br /> activities. These soil cuttings were placed back in the borehole at tlhe conclusion ofall borehole <br /> ,sampling. <br /> Drilling equipmengLe., auger Bights) and sampling equipment was decontaminated prior to <br /> each borehole following guidance provided in ERD SOP 4.5: formal Equipment <br /> Decontammafion: Sampling equipment decontamination (Goodrich and Lorega, 2012). As <br /> specified in SOP 4.5, this was done by mechanically removing all soil on the enact Bights or <br /> sloughing equipment to me same plastic shecting that contained the drill cuttings. After the aril <br /> removed,was the auger }lights and Bider equipment sees rinsed using potable Water from onsite <br /> water-supply Well 20. Routine monthly sampling or Well 20 water c0nftrmea that water firm <br />