My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU-2601188_SSCR
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CLARKSDALE
>
4915
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SU-2601188_SSCR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2026 2:47:48 PM
Creation date
4/10/2026 2:21:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSCR
RECORD_ID
SU-2601188
PE
2603 - SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION REPORT REVIEW
STREET_NUMBER
4915
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
CLARKSDALE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ACAMPO
Zip
95220
APN
01709059
CURRENT_STATUS
In Review
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Supplemental fields
Site Address
4915 E CLARKSDALE RD ACAMPO 95220
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
359
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4.0 EVALUATION OF PAST AND CURRENT SOURCES OF CONTAMINATIO IDENTIFIED <br /> AT OR NEAR THE SITE AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER ACTION <br /> [�] ❑ 4.1 Evaluation of each potential and/or known source of contamination identified(in the above section)for any real <br /> and/or potential threat to human health and the environment. This evaluation should take into consideration the <br /> proposed future uses of the project parcel. <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> ❑ �] 5.1 Discussion of the above evaluation to either rule out each source as a real or potential threat or to recommend <br /> further action to mitigate or abate any real or potential threats identified. Recommendations may include <br /> additional site assessment(i.e.collection of soil/water samples) and/or mitigative measures(i.e., clean up of <br /> surface wastes). All recommendations for future work must include a time frame for implementation. <br /> �] ❑ 5.2 The report was inclusive(i.e.all information referenced was included in this report—report should not reference <br /> other reports). <br /> ❑ 5.3 The report was signed,dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> [] 5.4 The report was prepared within six months of the date of the submittal of the land use application. <br /> ❑ 5.5 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in report. <br /> Reviewed By: Aaron Gooderh ub Reviewed Date: <br /> Erm 2e-02-001 Page 2 of 2 Surface&Sub Checklist <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.