My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU-2601443_SSNL
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
ALPINE
>
11065
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SU-2601443_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2026 4:20:43 PM
Creation date
7/17/2026 3:56:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU-2601443
PE
2602 - SOIL SUITABILITY AND NITRATE LOADING STUDY REVIEW
STREET_NUMBER
11065
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
ALPINE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95212
APN
06304023
CURRENT_STATUS
In Review
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Supplemental fields
Site Address
N RD STOCKTON 95212
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
562
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Soil Suitability 1 Nitrate Loading Study Irerracon <br /> W hWow Property ■ Stockton, CA <br /> November 20, 2019 F Terracon Project No. NA197078 <br /> 1.6.7 Discussion of Percolation Test Resuits <br /> Based on the percolation tests, boring B1 (3.5 feet bgs) failed to demonstrate a satisfactory <br /> percolation rate due to the clay soils present at shallow depths. Borings B4 (16 Feet bgs). B5 (18 <br /> feet bgs), and B6 (7 Feet bgs)demonstrated a relatively steady percolation rate between 125 and <br /> 250 minutes per inch throughout the testing period with the exception of one or two zero readings <br /> which resulted in a zero percolation rate. Boring B3 was tested twice once at 25 feet bgs which <br /> failed to percolate sufficiently due to very dense soils at depth. A sand lense was encountered at <br /> approximately 21 feet bgs in boring 133; therefore, Terracon backfilled the boring with <br /> approximately 4 feet of gravel and conducted a second percolation test at 21 feet bgs which <br /> demonstrated in a passing percolation rate of 27.7 minutes per inch. There was a question as to <br /> which percolation rate the EHD would accept; however, on November 7, 2019, Terracon was <br /> informed by Mr. Michael Kith that the passing percolation rate at boring 83 was acceptable. <br /> 1.6.8 discussion of Septic System Sizing <br /> In general, septic system construction should follow the San Joaquin County On-Site Wastewater <br /> Treatment Standards (OWTS) where applicable. The color coded map of San Joaquin County <br /> available at the EHD indicates the site is located in a clay zone where leach lines with pits are <br /> permitted. Refer to the OWTS Table 9.7.1 — Standard OWTS Design Requirements (page 28 of <br /> 40) for septic tank and leach line sizing recommendations. <br /> 2.0 NITRATE LOADING STUDY <br /> Because of concern regarding nitrate leaching into groundwater from septic systems, a nitrate <br /> loading analysis is required by the EHD for the proposed development to determine the potential <br /> concentration of percolating effluent and rain fall over the long term. Where percolating effluent <br /> leaches into the ground, groundwater quality may be impacted to some degree should the effluent <br /> reach groundwater. <br /> The method utilized for the nitrate loading analysis is based on a simple mass balance formula, <br /> discussed in a published article by Hantzsche and Finnemore (1992), which provides a <br /> convenient and simplified method to estimate long-term groundwater nitrate impacts on an area- <br /> wide basis. <br /> Hantzsche and Finnemore found that over a long period of time, water quality in the upper <br /> saturated groundwater zone closely approximates the quality of percolating recharge waters. <br /> They believe that their method is a good planning too[and provides useful information to planners <br /> and local officials but with some real limitations. In their article published in Ground Water, <br /> Hantzsche and Finnemore mention that "_..the equation ignores dispersion, lateral flow, and <br /> mixing with groundwater flow from up-gradient areas. These processes would generally <br /> contribute to additional reduction of nitrate-nitrogen concentrations in groundwater to the extent <br /> that the nitrate-nitrogen concentration of groundwater flow from up-gradient areas is lower." <br /> Responsive ■ Resourceful a Reliable 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.