My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU-2601443_SSNL
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
ALPINE
>
11065
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SU-2601443_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2026 4:20:43 PM
Creation date
7/17/2026 3:56:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU-2601443
PE
2602 - SOIL SUITABILITY AND NITRATE LOADING STUDY REVIEW
STREET_NUMBER
11065
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
ALPINE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95212
APN
06304023
CURRENT_STATUS
In Review
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Supplemental fields
Site Address
N RD STOCKTON 95212
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
562
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Soil Suitability / Nitrate Loading Study <br /> 11065 North Alpine Road I Stockton, California r rerracon <br /> June 30, 2026 1 Terracon Project No. NA267068 <br /> The total maximum daily flow rate for the proposed ADU is 420 gpd. However, the <br /> average long-term daily rate is estimated at 200 gpd. Combined with the existing <br /> residence, the average long-term daily rate is estimated at 450 gpd. <br /> Based on the nitrate loading balance, nitrate levels for the proposed development are <br /> anticipated to increase nitrate levels up to 12.7 mg/L-N which is above the MCL of 10 <br /> mg/L-N. The result of the nitrate loading balance (12.7 mg/L-N) indicates that the <br /> proposed development may cause an increase of nitrates in the aquifer above the MCL. <br /> In summary, the parcel appears suitable for the proposed development. The septic <br /> system design should accommodate peak flows and follow the San Joaquin County <br /> OWTS standards where applicable. If the EHD requires mitigation for the project, an <br /> advanced water treatment product may be considered a mitigation option. Additionally, <br /> water treatment options for drinking water should also be considered. <br /> 4. LIMITATIONS <br /> As indicated, our study takes into account the subject property only with the sewage <br /> load applied over the property site area. The study does not take into account <br /> surrounding properties and/or lands. The method utilized for the nitrate loading analysis <br /> is based on a simple mass balance formula, discussed in a published article by <br /> Hantzsche and Finnemore (1992), which provides a convenient and simplified method to <br /> estimate long-term groundwater nitrate impacts on an area-wide basis. A more detailed <br /> analysis was not requested nor intended. <br /> Our professional services were performed, our findings obtained, and our conclusions <br /> proposed in accordance with generally accepted engineering principles and practices. <br /> This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties either expressed or implied. Test findings <br /> and statements of professional opinion do not constitute a guarantee or warranty, <br /> expressed or implied. <br /> S.SELECTED REFERENCES <br /> California Department of Conservation Geologic Map of California, <br /> https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/gmc/, accessed October 2023 <br /> California Department of Water Resources Sustainable Groundwater Management Act <br /> (SGMA), https://sgma.water.ca.gov/webgis/?appid=SGMADataViewer#gwlevels, <br /> accessed October 2023 <br /> Facilities I Environmental I Geotechnical I Materials 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.