2013co-29C-353 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS STATE BRIDGE #: 29C-353 DATE BUILT: 11111950 WATERWAY: Delta Mendota Canal POSTED LOAD: No ROAD NAME: Koster Rd DESIGN LOAD: STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION: Tee Beam Material: Concrete Overall Span Length: 107.94 ft BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DATE REBUILT/WIDENED: 11111950 DATE INSPECTED: 3 " INSPECTED BY• Clear Width: 20.01 ft 1. BRIDGE APPROACH ROADWAY Far Type klotApplicable Near Type NvtApplicabk 44 C. 1a Condition ❑ No Significant Defects Noted ❑ Pavement Rutting @ Cracks @ j', „� f L ❑ Pavement Subsidence Adjacent to Abutment @ 1 ; Remarks 2. BRIDGE APPROACH GUARD RAILING Type °, "o: 2a Condition. ❑ No Significant Defects Noted ❑ Missing "P" Markers @ Remarks 3. BRIDGE RAILING Type Y r Al a(, 1? 0 ,') !� ;E. ! 1„, - P' i,,+I - � , a- s7^ r�,L 3a Condition ❑ No Significant Defects Noted ❑ Shimmy Railing Due to Deterioration ❑ Rail Post ❑ Outside Stringers ❑ Dry Rot between Railpost & Stringer @ Span ❑ Debris built up @ base of concrete railing Remarks i`., �. _ S E: 1. i�Fa'r 4. BRIDGE SUPERSTRUCTURE Type Concrete Cast -in -Place 4a. Condition � No significant defects noted ❑ Clogged from ❑ Debris ❑ Vegetation growth ❑ Other 4b Deck Condition(s) Surface Deck Condition ❑ No significant defects noted ( Cracks @ Spam n Cracks Between Timber Plank Decking Rating ❑ g @ p . ❑ g ❑ ❑ y ❑ p @ p Scaling San Light Medium Heavy Sall San ❑ Rebar Delamination Found @ Span ❑ Deck overlay preventing proper visual inspection Remarks iie Soffit ❑ No significant defects noted ❑ Cracks @ Span ❑ Corroding @ Span ❑ Corrosion on Metal Decking @ Span ❑ Rebar exposure ❑ Section Loss Depth ❑ Efflorescence @ Span ❑ Timber planks decaying due to ❑ Moisture Infiltration ❑ Mold/Fungus Growth Remarks0< 4c Super Structure Condition(s) other than Deck Superstructure [J No significant defects noted ❑ Cracks @ Span ❑ Spalling @ Span Condition Rating ❑ Timber Stringer Surface check ❑ End check ❑ Through check ❑ Water Stain @ Span ❑ Damaged Stringer # @ Span Abutment Bent ❑ Timber stringer decaying due to ❑ Moisture infiltration ❑ Mold/fungus Growth ❑ Section Loss Depth ❑ Bearing damage due to ❑ Moisture infiltration ❑ Mold/Fungus growth ❑ Section Loss Depth Remarks-°" of 5. BRIDGE SUBSTRUCTURE/FOUNDATION Type 5a Condition Abutment ❑ No significant defects noted ❑ Cracks @ ❑ Abrasion @ all vertical surfaces ❑ RSP ❑ Undermining at Diaphragm ❑ Scour @ ❑ Section Loss Depth ❑ Timber Pile Decaying Due To ❑ Aging ❑ Mold/FungusGrowth Remarks W�jAwi ,tom- t 4) 5b Condition Wing Wall No significant defects noted ❑ Cracks @ ❑Abrasion at all vertical surfaces ❑ Scour Damage @ ❑ Timber Pile Decaying Due To ❑ Aging ❑ Mold/Fungus growth ❑ Section Loss Depth ❑ Timber Plank Decaying Due To ❑ Moisture infiltration ❑ Mold/Fungus Growth 5c Pile/Bent Conditions ❑ No significant defects noted ❑ Debris & draft caught on pile bent # ❑ Cracks @ Substructure ❑ Spalling @ ❑ Abrasion ❑ Undermining @ ❑ Scour @ Condition Rating ❑ Timber Pile Decaying Due To ❑ Moisture Infiltration ❑ Mold/Fungus growth ❑ Section Loss Depth ❑ Timber Cap Decaying Due To ❑ Moisture Infiltration ❑ Mold/Fungus growth ❑ Section Loss Depth Remarks 5d Invert Type (Culvert Only) Conditions•❑ No significant defects noted ❑ Abrasion @ ❑ Undermining @ 6. CHANNEL Type Channel Condition 6a Condition(s) ❑ No significant defects noted ❑ Bank Erosion ❑ Channel Degradation Rating 6b Vegetation Growth ❑ Dense ❑ Moderate ❑ Light Vegitation Growth Location ❑ Bank ❑ Channel Bed Remarks i ^r County Bridge Inspection Report