Laserfiche WebLink
Douglas Brown <br /> 6781 Cherokee Lane <br /> Page 2 <br /> July 24, 1979 . <br /> B. On April 17 , 1979, a Policy Statement regarding con- <br /> ventional loan approvals- was issued which required <br /> Professional staff to monitor , through field inspection, <br /> the state of compliance with 'San Joaquin County Qrdinances <br /> 549 and 1862 , <br /> ITEM Policy attached (Attachment II) . <br /> ITEM On May 14, 1979 , Ms . Sue DeCicco of Riggs , Didier <br /> and Smith, Inc . , Realtors , requested a well and <br /> septic tank inspection for a conventional loan in <br /> escrow (No . 32082 , Western Title) (request attached <br /> as Attachment III) . <br /> ITEM The premise was inspected by Ms . Karen Moroz , R. S. <br /> on May 22 , 1979 , in accordance with existing policy <br /> and procedure. (See policy procedure No. I, B. 1. ) . <br /> Several major deficiencies , and violation of County <br /> statutes were detected, and Ms . Moroz would not sign <br /> an approval of the installations when such were <br /> violations of statutes . On June 13, 1979 , a letter <br /> to this effect was mailed to the Realtor (Letter in <br /> attachment as Attachment IV) . <br /> C . It is apparent , that the inspectional procedure prior to <br /> April 1979 , did not adequately provide for a demonstration <br /> of compliance with statutes , but did provide for a verifi- <br /> cation that well water was potable, and the septic system <br /> was not in a state of failure at the time of inspection. <br /> Such was the content of the Districts letter of September <br /> 19 , 1977 . <br /> The current inspectional procedure provides for a verification <br /> of compliance with existing statutes, and violations of Ordi- <br /> nances 549 and 1862 are identifiable , <br /> D. Summary <br /> Local Health District -Sanitarians are not willing to make <br /> statements of approval for installations which are in vio- <br /> lation of statutes , The District 's letter of June 13 , 1979 , <br /> did not preclude the continued processing of the conventional <br /> loan and the buyer and seller could have exercised their <br /> option to complete their personal transaction irrespective <br /> of the absence of a Local Health District ' s approval of the <br /> system. The June '13, 1979 , letter made clear that no ap- <br /> proving signature was forth coming until the installations <br /> were in compliance. It seems that the state of non-compliance, <br />