Laserfiche WebLink
1 other costs of litigation and investigation incurred to date. <br /> 2 17. INTERPRETATION. <br /> 3 This Consent Judgment shall be deemed to have been drafted equally by all Parties <br /> 4 hereto. Accordingly, the Parties hereby agree that any and all rules of construction to the effect <br /> 5 that ambiguity is construed against the drafting Party shall be inapplicable in any dispute <br /> 6 concerning the terms, meaning, or interpretation of this Consent Judgment. <br /> 7 18. INCORPORATION OF EXHIBITS <br /> 8 Exhibit"A" is incorporated herein by reference. <br /> 9 19. INTEGRATION. <br /> 10 This Consent Judgment constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties and may not <br /> 1 I be amended or supplemented except as provided for in the Consent Judgment. <br /> 12 20. MODIFICATION OF CONSENT JUDGMENT. <br /> 13 This Consent Judgment may be modified only upon written consent by the Parties hereto <br /> 14 and the approval of the Court or as provided for by law. <br /> 15 IT IS SO STIPULATED: <br /> 16 FOR THE PLAINTIFF <br /> 17 Dated: October�, 2007 EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Attorney General <br /> of the State of California <br /> 18 THEODORA BERGER <br /> Senior Assistant Attorney General <br /> 19 <br /> 20 fvv <br /> BRETT J. MORRIS <br /> 21 Deputy Attorney General <br /> Attorneys for Plaintiff, People of the State of California <br /> 22 <br /> 23 Dated: October 22 , 2007 JAMES P. WILLETT, District orney <br /> of the County of San um <br /> 24 <br /> 25 <br /> DAVI J. Y <br /> 26 Supervising eputy Di 'ct Attorney <br /> Attorneys f r Plaint' , People of the State of California <br /> 27 /// <br /> 28 <br /> It <br /> CONSENT JUDGMENT,ORDER FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND CIVIL PENALTIES <br />