My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
STOCKTON
>
942
>
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
>
PR0514391
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2019 11:57:51 AM
Creation date
9/17/2018 10:55:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
PRE 2019
RECORD_ID
PR0514391
PE
2220
FACILITY_ID
FA0007683
FACILITY_NAME
DIAMOND PET FOOD PROCESSORS RIPON
STREET_NUMBER
942
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
STOCKTON
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
RIPON
Zip
95366
APN
25934012
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
942 S STOCKTON AVE
P_LOCATION
05
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
EJimenez
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
217
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS <br />FOX VALLEY CORPORATION <br />AND FOX RIVER PAPER COMPANY <br />RIPON MILL <br />SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br />-3- <br />11. The ground water model looked at the semi -perched aquifer zone, the upper aquifer zone, <br />and an intermediate aquifer zone. The semi -perched zone had an average TDS of 938 mg/l; <br />the upper aquifer had an average TDS of 566 mg/l; and the intermediate aquifer had an <br />average TDS of 422 mg/l. Over a five-year period, the model predicts that TDS in the semi - <br />perched zone will improve as a result of the lowered TDS in the plant discharge. A report <br />discussing the effect of the discharge on TDS in the three water -bearing zones is due in 1998 <br />and every five years thereafter. <br />12. Following extensive ground water modeling, the Discharger's consultant David A. <br />Lawrence, C.E.G. 618, stated in a letter, dated 21 September 1992, that the Discharger's <br />discharge at 1100 mg/1 is not a designated waste and will not cause degradation of the waters <br />of the State of California beyond ambient environmental conditions. The Discharger will <br />continue ground water monitoring to confirm that its discharge is not impacting or degrading <br />ground water. <br />13. The beneficial uses of the Stanislaus River and downstream waters are municipal, industrial, <br />and agricultural supply; recreation; esthetic enjoyment; navigation; and preservation and <br />enhancement of fish, wildlife and other aquatic resources. <br />14. The beneficial uses of the ground water are municipal, industrial, and agricultural supply. <br />15. The Board adopted a Water Quality Control Plan, Third Edition, for the Sacramento River <br />Basin and the San Joaquin River Basin (hereafter Basin Plan), which contains water quality <br />objectives for all waters of the Basin. These requirements implement the Basin Plan. <br />16. The action to update waste discharge requirements for this facility is exempt from the <br />provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in accordance with Title 14, <br />California Code of Regulations (CCR), Section 15301. <br />17. This discharge is exempt from the requirements of Title 23, CCR, Section 2510, et seq. <br />(hereafter Chapter 15). The exemption, pursuant to Section 2511(b), is based on the <br />following: <br />a. The Board is issuing waste discharge requirements, <br />b. The discharge complies with the Basin Plan, and <br />C. The waste water does not need to be managed according to 22 CCR, Division 4, <br />Chapter 30, as a hazardous waste. <br />18. The Board has notified the Discharger and interested agencies and persons of its intent to <br />prescribe waste discharge requirements for this discharge and has provided them with an <br />opportunity for a public hearing and an opportunity to submit their written views and <br />recommendations. <br />19. The Board, in a public meeting, heard and considered all comments pertaining to the <br />discharge. <br />IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that Fox Valley Corporation and Fox River Paper Company, <br />Ripon Mill, and its agents, assigns, and successors, in order to meet the provisions contained in <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.