Laserfiche WebLink
SWRCB, January 2002 Page 6 of 7 <br />8. FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING <br />Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sums LN <br />Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested U <br />Test Method Developed By: U Sump Manufacturer U Industry Standard U Professional Engineer <br />U Other (Spec) <br />Test Method Used: U Pressure U Vacuum U Hydrostatic <br />U Other (Spec) <br />Test Equipment Used: <br />Fill Sump # Fill Sump # <br />Equipment Resolution: <br />Fill Sump # Fill Sump # <br />Sump Diameter: <br />Sump Depth: <br />Height from Tank Top to Top of <br />Highest Piping Penetration: <br />Height from Tank Top to Lowest <br />Electrical Penetration: <br />Condition of sump prior to <br />testing: <br />Portion of Sump Tested <br />Sump Material: <br />Wait time between applying <br />pressure/vacuum/water and <br />starting test: <br />Test Start Time: <br />Initial Reading (R,): <br />Test End Time: <br />Final Reading (RF): <br />Test Duration: <br />Chane in Reading RF -R,): <br />Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: <br />Test Result: <br />U Pass U Fail <br />U Pass U Fall <br />U Pass U Fail <br />U Pass U Fail <br />Is there a sensor in the sump? <br />tlYes U No <br />U Yes U No <br />U Yes U No <br />U Yes U No <br />Does the sensor alarm when <br />either product or water is <br />detected? <br />U Yes U No U NA <br />U Yes U No U NA <br />U Yes U No U NA <br />U Yes U No U NA <br />Was sensor removed,for testing? <br />U Ves U No U NA <br />U Yes U No U NA <br />U Yes U No U NA <br />U Yes U No U NA <br />Was sensor properly replaced and <br />verified functional after tcsting`r <br />V Yes U No U NA <br />U Yes U No U NA <br />U Yes U No U NA <br />U Yes U No U NA <br />Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up forfailed tests) <br />No Secondary Containment on fill risers at this site. <br />