Laserfiche WebLink
FROM : OIL EQUIPMENT PHONE NO. : 209 7545726 Jan. 16 2003 04:52AM P8 <br />SWRCB, January 2002 <br />8. FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TES' <br />Facility is Not E ui ed With Fill Riser Containment Sums U <br />Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested U <br />Page 7 of 8 <br />Test Method Developed By: I..) Sump Manufacturer U Industry Standard U Professional Engineer <br />❑ Other (S cify) <br />Test Method Used: !.1 Pressure U Vacuum U I�ydrostelie <br />U Other (Sped) _ <br />Test l7quipment t lsed: Equipment Resolution: <br />l•YIt Sump # F111 Sump # T ill Sum # Fill Sum # <br />Sump Diameter. <br />_Sump Depth: <br />Height from Tank Top to Top of <br />Highest Piping Penetration: <br />Height from Tank Top to Lowest <br />Electrical Penetration: <br />Condition of sump prior to <br />testing: <br />Portion of Sump Tested <br />Sump Material: <br />Wait time between applying <br />pressure/vacuum/water and <br />Starting test: <br />Test Start Time: <br />Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: <br />Test Result: <br />U Pass U Fail <br />U Pass U Pail <br />U Pass Ll Fail <br />U pass U Fail <br />Is them a sensor in the sump? <br />u Yes I j No <br />U Yes U No <br />U Yes U No <br />U Yes U No <br />Does the Sensor alarm when <br />either product or water is <br />U Yes ilNo U NA <br />0 Ycs U No tJ NA <br />U Yrs U No U NA <br />U Yes U No U NA <br />detected? <br />W <br />�I.J <br />Was sensor rcmoved•for testing? <br />U Ves IJ No U NA <br />U Yes U No U NA <br />Yes U No U NA <br />U Yes U No U NA <br />Was sensor properly replaced and <br />lJ Yes U No U NA <br />U Yes U No LINA <br />U Yes U No U NA <br />U Ycs UNo U NA <br />verified functional after testing`r <br />Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing and recommended fol/owLap /roiled les1.9) <br />