Laserfiche WebLink
d <br /> Gabriel Gonzalez [ EH ] <br /> From: Nuel Henderson [EH] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 4:22 PM <br /> To: Gabriel Gonzalez [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: Apache Plastics, 2050 E. Fremont, Stockton <br /> Gabe, <br /> As the site will soon be Cori's, we'll monitor any way she likes. I had already noted the change of groundwater gradient <br /> direction. It may be good to review some older reports to be sure and document it for Cori. <br /> Nuel <br /> From: Gabriel Gonzalez [EH] —� <br /> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 4:02 PM <br /> To: Nuel Henderson [EH] <br /> Subject: FW: Apache Plastics, 2050 E. Fremont, Stockton <br /> Hi Nuel, <br /> I' m forwarding to you Cori's response email below. <br /> Gabe <br /> From: Condon, Cori@Waterboards [mailto:Cori.Condon@waterboards.ca.gov] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 3 : 58 PM <br /> To: Gabriel Gonzalez [EH] <br /> Cc: Barton, Jim@Waterboards <br /> Subject: RE: Apache Plastics, 2050 E. Fremont, Stockton <br /> Hi Gabriel, <br /> Thank you for being willing to request monitoring from Apache Plastics. I looked at your proposed plan and <br /> suggest the following modifications: <br /> MW-5 — semi-annual <br /> MW-6 - semi-annual <br /> MW-7 — annual <br /> MW-16 — semi-annual <br /> MW-17 — semi-annual <br /> (I don't generally accept any monitoring less than an annual frequency. ) <br /> I agree with the analytes list as you proposed . <br /> I uploaded the Notice of Applicability ( NOA) and the associated Monitoring and Reporting Program (MRP) to <br /> GeoTracker today, You can see from the MRP that I also required monitoring from wells; MW-10, MW-15, MW- <br /> 14, MW-18, MW-19 and MW-20, as I had requested you address. There is no problem in asking for duplication <br /> of sampling that you may want to see from this site since you will ultimately need to make the determination if <br /> the site meets closure criteria . <br /> My final comment on this site is the disparity between the pollutant plume configuration and the calculated <br /> groundwater gradient direction . The pollution seems to have moved to the south and east. Now the gradient <br /> 1 <br />