Laserfiche WebLink
WHSTERN GEO1. QC [ C Rf so " CFS , INC . <br /> ALI <br /> 2 on 30 August 1989 and 5 September <br /> inch 19$9,respectively, BB <br /> Boring B-3 and -4 w <br /> ere completed as 2- <br /> monitor wells MW-3 and MW-4 on 26 and 27 September 1989,respectively. The screened interval <br /> Far well MW-I is between 46.6 f?and 66.5 ft below <br /> between 5225 h and 6725 h below grade. The screened interval forcreenwell Md interval for well _W-3 is between 4625 ft and <br /> 65.25 ft below grade. The screened interval for well MW-4 is between 55 ft and 68S it below <br /> Well construction details For the four wells are included on the burin 1 grade. <br /> screens were terminated between 6 ft and 18 ft above static water levels too ow four Appendix possible The well <br /> fluctuations poss seasonal <br /> Monitor weU MW-1 was initially developed on 31 August 1989 by WGRgeologist R' <br /> �r Baldwin using a combination of bailing and water injection techniques. A r Richns ard <br /> groundwater and injected water were removed from the well. Moderate amounts of salt were ptely 12 r s nt <br /> in the groundwater at the end of the development process. Monitor wells MW-1 and MW 2 present <br /> developed by WGR technicians Beverly Baldwin and Mike Parkinson on 6 September i98and well weer <br /> 1 was developed using a combination of bailing,surge block and water injection injection techniques. A total of <br /> -„� 19.5 gallons of groundwater and injected water were removed from the well,with pumping rates ranging <br /> from about 0.3 gallons-per-minutes(gpm)to about 17.6 <br /> gpm• Well MW-2 was developed using bailing, <br /> surge block- pumping techniques and a total of 55 gallons of groundwater were removed from the <br /> well at an average pumping rate of about 1.7 gpm <br /> eaviroamental . Wells MW-3 and MW-4 were developed by WGR <br /> technicians Madeleine Stanger and Randy Smith using surge block and bailing techniques <br /> on 28 September 1989. A total of 17 gallons of groundwater were removed from the wells at <br /> { rates averaging 0.14 pumping <br /> gpm. All development water was temporarily stored on-site in 55-gallon drums <br /> - pending laboratory analysis. <br /> 3.3 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING <br /> Water samples were collected from well MW-1 on 31 August 1989 by WGR staff. These <br /> samples were collected at [he end of an incomplete development process and are probably not <br /> 2completely�_ representative of groundwater conditions beneath the site. Water samples were collected <br /> from wells M111-1 and <br /> MW 2 an 7 Seplember 1989 and from wells MW-1 thou <br /> 4 on 29 <br /> September 1989 by WGR staff, according to the WGR standard operating procedure included as <br /> Appendix D. A minimum of three well-casing volumes were purged with steam-cleaned PVC bailers <br /> prior to sampling. The groundwater samples and travel blanks, made up of deionized water at the <br /> laboratory,were sent under chain-of=custody to CCA <br /> bEPA Method 8240. S of Napa or CCAS of San Luis Obispo for analysis <br /> y <br /> 066RIN09 <br /> 4 <br />