Laserfiche WebLink
S E C O R <br />First Quarter 2003, Quarterly Progress Report <br />April 15, 2003 <br />Page 3 <br />3 3 Soil Vapor Extraction System <br />The SVE system is comprised of four vapor wells (VE -1 through VE -4), connected by mechanical piping <br />to a 5 horsepower (hp) positive -displacement blower, and a catalytic oxidizer Vapors from the sod are <br />removed under vacuum by the blower and petroleum hydrocarbons in these vapors are destroyed by a <br />catalytic oxidizer, prior to discharging the air stream to the atmosphere The San Joaquin Valley Air <br />Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) permits the operation of the SVE system under permit No N-4343- <br />1.0 <br />To assess the effectiveness of the SVE system, process samples were collected monthly from the vapor <br />stream before (INFL) and after (EFFL) the catalytic oxidizer Each sample was analyzed for TPHg, <br />BTEX, and MtBE Maximum constituent concentrations are presented below <br />During the 1003 the SVE system was approximately 60% operable System down time was attributed to <br />a mechanical failure of the vapor extraction blower and the resultant time necessary to make repairs <br />Tables 5 and 6 present operational measurements and calculated mass removal rates for TPHg, <br />benzene, and MtBE, respectively <br />' During 1 Q03 the SVE system removed approximately 5 1 pounds of TPHg Although petroleum <br />hydrocarbons were not detected in the influent vapor stream , a concentration of one-half the laboratory <br />detection limit was used to facilitate calculations Since operation began, the SVE system has removed <br />an estimated 4,120 1 pounds of TPHg, 85 7 pounds of benzene, and 443 8 pounds of MtBE Mass <br />rremoval trends and influent soil vapor TPHg, benzene, and MtBE concentrations versus time are shown <br />on Figures 8 and 9, respectively <br />3.4 Hydrocarbon Mass Estimate <br />The hydrocarbon mass estimates presented below are an update of results presented within the Problem <br />Assessment Report/ Final Remediation Plan (PAR/FRP) Addendum, dated June 5, 2001 Methodology <br />' for determining the mass of hydrocarbons adsorbed to sod and dissolved in groundwater can be found <br />within the PAR/FRP Addendum <br />' <br />34.1 Estimated Mass of Petroleum Hydrocarbons Dissolved In Groundwater <br />The results presented below are based on the calculation presented within the PAR/FRP Addendum and <br />cumulative 1003 GWE mass removal data To conservatively estimate analyte mass remaining, <br />' historical groundwater analytical data was used This information is summarized In the following table <br />I <br />11Chevron1957751Penodic MonitoringlQuarterly Progress Reports1200311s1 Quarter -2063 QPR1 REV C doc <br />G <br />Maximum Constituent Concentration (ppmV) <br />SAMPLING <br />December 17, 2002 through March 18, 2003 <br />LOCATION <br />TPHg <br />Benzene <br />Toluene <br />Ethyl -benzene <br />Xylenes <br />MtBE <br />INFL <br /><5 0 <br /><0 050 <br /><0 050 <br /><0 050 <br />0 59 <br /><0 10 <br />EFFL <br /><5 0 <br /><0 050 <br /><0 050 <br /><0 050 <br /><0 050 <br /><0 10 <br />Explanations <br />7:1 <br />ppmV = Parts per million by volume <br />< Indicates the constituent was not present at or above the method reporting limit shown <br />During the 1003 the SVE system was approximately 60% operable System down time was attributed to <br />a mechanical failure of the vapor extraction blower and the resultant time necessary to make repairs <br />Tables 5 and 6 present operational measurements and calculated mass removal rates for TPHg, <br />benzene, and MtBE, respectively <br />' During 1 Q03 the SVE system removed approximately 5 1 pounds of TPHg Although petroleum <br />hydrocarbons were not detected in the influent vapor stream , a concentration of one-half the laboratory <br />detection limit was used to facilitate calculations Since operation began, the SVE system has removed <br />an estimated 4,120 1 pounds of TPHg, 85 7 pounds of benzene, and 443 8 pounds of MtBE Mass <br />rremoval trends and influent soil vapor TPHg, benzene, and MtBE concentrations versus time are shown <br />on Figures 8 and 9, respectively <br />3.4 Hydrocarbon Mass Estimate <br />The hydrocarbon mass estimates presented below are an update of results presented within the Problem <br />Assessment Report/ Final Remediation Plan (PAR/FRP) Addendum, dated June 5, 2001 Methodology <br />' for determining the mass of hydrocarbons adsorbed to sod and dissolved in groundwater can be found <br />within the PAR/FRP Addendum <br />' <br />34.1 Estimated Mass of Petroleum Hydrocarbons Dissolved In Groundwater <br />The results presented below are based on the calculation presented within the PAR/FRP Addendum and <br />cumulative 1003 GWE mass removal data To conservatively estimate analyte mass remaining, <br />' historical groundwater analytical data was used This information is summarized In the following table <br />I <br />11Chevron1957751Penodic MonitoringlQuarterly Progress Reports1200311s1 Quarter -2063 QPR1 REV C doc <br />G <br />