Laserfiche WebLink
Union Point SPCC Plan contact lists do not include the National Response Center, or CA DFW Office of Spill Prevention <br /> and Response; Cal me ,r incaFFectly listed as a clean-up cantFacteF. <br /> 40 G.A.R. 142.7(e) FequiFes that the f-acility eenduct inspeetiens and tests aeeeFdanee vioth ;AgFitten pFeeedwes that the <br /> .-/.,.eFateF.,r the ceFtifying engineer.J.,.,.,Ieps fee the facility <br /> UniAGA PAGiRt SPGG Plan inspectien pFermedure states that"All wegetatiOR r-ARtrAIIPd ARCI Re wegetatien is allewed te <br /> n <br /> aFe r.t near the g el'r.i. AST <br /> 40 C.F.R. 112.7(h) addresses facility tank car and tank truck loading/unloading racks. <br /> Union Point SPCC Plan cites this section of the regulation, although there is not a loading/unloading rack at the <br /> facility.Tank Loading Area Containment should be addressed under 40 CFR 112.7(c) <br /> 40 C.F.R. 112.8(c)(1) requires a facility to restrain drainage from diked storage areas by valves to prevent a discharge into <br /> the drainage system or facility effluent treatment system, except where facility systems are designed to control such <br /> discharge. <br /> Union Point SPCC Plan variously states that 'no dikes exist on the facility'; 'There is no drain valves for two of the oil <br /> product containment areas'; and "There is one drainage valve on Union Point Marina Bar&Grill, Inc's oil product <br /> storage control systems." <br /> 40 C.F.R. 112.8(c)(2) requires a facility to construct all bulk storage tank installations so that you provide a secondary <br /> means of containment for the entire capacity of the largest single container and sufficient freeboard to contain <br /> precipitation. <br /> Union Point SPCC Plan calculation of fuel tank secondary containment does not allow for freeboard for precipitation, <br /> and shows that the secondary containment is not sufficient for 2000 gallons even without freeboard. No discussion <br /> found of secondary containment for used cooking oil tank, or calculation. <br /> 40 C.F.R. 112.8(c)(6) requires that the appropriate qualifications for personnel performing tests and inspections, the <br /> frequency and type of testing and inspections, which take into account container size, configuration, and design are <br /> determined in accordance with industry standards, <br /> Union Point SPCC Plan does not indicate the industry standard used to determine appropriate inspections and testing. <br /> Plan includes reference to a standards organization (Steel Tank Institute) but does not indicate the specific standard <br /> that is applicable for the inspections. If STI SP001 is the intended standard,the checklists of Union Point SPCC Plan <br /> Appendices B&C are not substantially equivalent. <br /> 40 C.F.R. 112.20(e) requires that if the owner or operator of a facility determines that the facility could not, because of <br /> its location, reasonably be expected to cause substantial harm to the environment by discharging oil into or on the <br /> navigable waters or adjoining shorelines,the owner or operator shall complete and maintain at the facility the <br /> certification form contained in appendix C. <br /> Union Point SPCC Plan Substantial Harm Determination does not include the Certification contained in 40 CFR 112 <br /> Appendix C,Attachment C-II. <br /> In addition to the preparation of an SPCC Plan, the regulations of 40 C.F.R. 112 require implementation of the <br /> Plan. When the training and first inspections required by the regulation and detailed in the Plan have been <br /> documented, electronic copies of those records should be submitted to EPA(email attachments are acceptable) as <br /> verification. <br /> Your continuing cooperation is appreciated, <br /> 3 <br />