Laserfiche WebLink
H. KLEINFELDER & ASSOC'6rXTES <br /> Mr. Tom Vogel <br /> May 20, 1986 <br /> Page two <br /> IV. FIELD ACTIVITIES <br /> The field investigation performed at the site included soil <br /> sampling and litholog.ic logging. <br /> One exploratory- boring was drilled to a depth of 26 feet on <br /> the subject property on May 27, 1986. A Mobile B-24 skid- <br /> mounted drill rig, equipped with 6-inch diameter free flight <br /> auger, was used for the soil boring. <br /> During the drilling, a Kleinfelder geologist classified the <br /> subsurface soils, collected soil samples, and logged the <br /> borehole. A description of the soils encountered are <br /> presented on Plate No. 2 , with a copy of the Unified Soil <br /> Classification System (used to identify the soil) included <br /> as Plate No. 3 . <br /> The exploratory boring drilled at the site on May 27, 1986 <br /> was located in a previously bored hole. The previous boring V3K0_X_ <br /> was advanced to a depth of 17 feet and then, we assume, �f --� <br /> backfilled with the drill cuttings. Therefore, the soils <br /> encountered during the first 17 feet of our boring, <br /> conducted May 27, 1986, are not indicative of the <br /> surrounding soil stratification. The soils encountered <br /> beyond the 17 foot depth consisted of light yellow brown and <br /> light grey brown clay silts and silty clay. <br /> Soil samples were extracted at 20 feet and 25 feet. A 2- <br /> inch I .D. Modified Porter Sampler, containing 6-inch brass <br /> liners, was used to collect the samples. The bottom tube <br /> was covered with aluminum foil, sealed with plastic caps, <br /> and placed in an ice cooler for transport under chain-of-- <br /> custody. <br /> V. FINDINGS <br /> Soil samples were submitted to a California Certified <br /> Laboratory for analyses. The laboratory results indicate <br /> "&t----n9 petroleum hydrocarbons were detected at or above a <br /> 20 detection limit . In addition, the soils observed by <br /> our geologist in the field did not exhibit any diesel odor <br /> or fluid cut. A copy of the laboratory results are in the <br /> appendix of this report. <br /> EE <br />