Laserfiche WebLink
Existing Known Conditions <br /> The known lithology of the site is comprised of low permeable silts and clays the first 45'feet below the <br /> . surface . The first aquifer, consisting of highly permeable sand, begins a 45' below the surface and <br /> terminates between 56' and 60' below the surface into silty sand. This aquifer is contaminated with <br /> concentrations of MTBE to 3 ug/L as of the last monitoring event. TPHg is also present in concentration <br /> to 14 mg/L,and Benzene is present to 13 ug/L,as per the last monitoring event.The groundwater surface <br /> varies seasonally from 42 to 49 feet below the surface. <br /> Existing Equipment Installed on the Site. <br /> The site has been recently developed with new building construction comprising a bank office and <br /> commercial business. During construction the developer built a 10'x 21'underground vault to contain <br /> future remediation equipment.Also during construction,a conduit was laid from the vault to a proposed <br /> extraction well location. A 6" extraction well was installed in a 15" soil bore at this location as part of <br /> the very successful pump test performed by ATC during January and February of this year (see ATC <br /> Pump Test Report Attached). <br /> Recap of the Pump Test Results <br /> Using the Theis Solution method the average Storage Coefficient (S) was 2.4E-3 and the Hydraulic <br /> Conductivity was 0.012 cm/sec. The short steady state discharge rate was 13.5 gpm with a Radius of <br /> Influence (ROT)of greater than 90 feet(the furthest monitoring well from the extraction well). At the <br /> time of the pump test the static groundwater level was+/- 49'below the surface at the extraction well. <br /> Remediation Technology Available <br /> • 1. Local remediation sites in the area of Southwest Lodi have used Activated Carbon filtration as a <br /> "Pump and Treat'filter. This type of remediation was also used to reclaim the effluent from the above <br /> referenced pump test conducted by ATC. <br /> 2.Other technologies,such as Air Sparging,are available and in common use on sites that are not limited <br /> by the following criteria: (As per EPA Publication 510•B-95-007 "How To Evaluate Alternative <br /> Technologies For Underground Storage Tank Sites") <br /> a. No free product on the surface_of the groundwater on the site: The site does not have any free <br /> gasoline product on the groundwater. <br /> b. There can not be any basements or confined spacces present or near the site: This site does not have <br /> any basements or confined spaces on the or near the site_ <br /> c. Contaminated groundwater can not be located in a confinedaquifer system: The contaminated <br /> aquifer is confined by low permeable soils above and below the contaminated aquifer.The strata above <br /> the aquifer is made up of a very impervious layer of silty clays with some hardpan to a thickness of <br /> twenty feet starting about 25 feet below the surface. The eleven foot contaminated aquifer is located <br /> directly above a strata of silts and clays. .�� <br /> C <br /> Due to the fact the contamination on this site is located in a confined aquifer,Air Sparging must be ruled <br /> out as a possible technology for remediation of this site. " <br /> Bioremediation has been tried,but has failed to remove MTBE to non detect or acceptable levels. Both <br /> Air Sparging and Bioremediation methods have found success in remediation of TPHg and BETX <br /> 2 <br />