Laserfiche WebLink
Ms Mary Meays <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> December 6, I994 <br /> Page 2 <br /> On 30 April 1993, hydropunch groundwater samples were collected adjacent to the four sides of <br /> the former limits of the excavation (this hydropunch sampling was documented in a report <br /> prepared by Treadwell & Rollo, Inc dated 17 June 1993 and titled "Report, Groundwater <br /> Sampling, 4110 Industrial Way, Tracy, California" This data was duplicated in the subsequent <br /> report, titled "Monitoring Well Installation, 4110 Industrial Way, Tracy, California", presented in <br /> Attachment D) Diesel was detected in the two samples from the north and west sides of the <br /> excavation at 0 2 and 0 4 parts per million (ppm), respectively Toluene was detected in a single <br /> sample at 0 0005 ppm No other BTXE nor extractable (diesel) hydrocarbon constituents were <br /> detected <br /> In a letter dated 10 August 1993, the San Joaquin County Health Services Agency (Agency), the <br /> local enforcement agency, requested additional work at the site including the installation and <br /> sampling of three shallow groundwater monitoring wells In a phone conversation on 17 August <br /> 1993, the Agency agreed to a reduced scope of work which included the installation and sampling <br /> of a single well downgradient from the former excavation, as indicated by the results from the <br /> hydropunch sampling On 29 September 1993, monitoring well MW-1 was drilled and installed, <br /> in accordance with conventional protocols, to a depth of approximately 21 feet within about five <br /> feet and north and west of the former limits of the excavation (Figure 2) The well construction <br /> and sampling of the soil and groundwater were documented in a report prepared by Treadwell & <br /> Rollo, Inc dated 18 November 1993 and titled "Monitoring Well Installation, 4110 Industrial <br /> Way, Tracy, California" (Attachment D) No extractable hydrocarbons (diesel) nor BTXE were <br /> detected in a soil sample collected at the groundwater interface and only a trace level of diesel, <br /> (0 1 ppm) and no BTXE, were detected in the groundwater sample This well was the focus of <br /> the subsequent quarterly monitoring discussed in greater detail in other sections of this report <br /> Groundwater Monitoring- On September 29, 1994, our sampling technician purged and <br /> sampled the monitoring well following the methodologies described in greater detail in <br /> Attachment A, Protocol for Groundwater Sampling A factory-cleaned, disposable, polyethylene <br /> bailer was used to both purge and sample the well The field parameters measured during <br /> sampling were recorded on a field data sheet which is duplicated and presented in Attachment B, <br /> Field Data The groundwater sample was decanted into sample containers prepared and provided <br /> by a contracted analytical laboratory These containers were labeled, placed into an ice-cooled <br /> chest, and transported to American Environmental Network (AEN), a California Environmental <br /> Protection Agency certified laboratory in Pleasant Hill, California AEN also performed the <br /> chemical analyses for the samples collected during monitoring for the previous three quarters <br /> The groundwater sample was analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (GCFID 3510), <br /> benzene, toluene, xylenes-total, and ethylbenzene (BTXE) (EPA 8020) A trip blank was also <br /> analyzed for BTXE constituents A copy of the laboratory analytical reports for these analyses <br /> �} and the chain-of custody record are attached (Attachment C) <br />