Laserfiche WebLink
I'Vers"TarIONC SACRAMENTO <br />• Letter to Mr. Ulycess Williams <br />May 16, 1989 <br />Page 2 <br />The property was acquired by Mr. Williams in 1987. Since that time he <br />has leveled the grade and removed the concrete foundation of the former_ <br />service station. <br />VERSAR INVESTIGATION <br />UST Removal Documentation <br />Versar obtained a copy of a letter dated August 31, 1977, from the <br />Marketing Department at Chevron U.S.A., Inc. (Chevron), to the Lessee of <br />the station. In the letter, Chevron stated they had "removed the <br />improvements" which reportedly included the USTs. <br />In a letter dated March 16, 1989, Versar requested that Chevron <br />review their records for information regarding the site. A copy of the <br />letter is included in Attachment III. Chevron's letter dated August 31, <br />1977, is also included in Attachment III. <br />• Ms. Heather Heath, Marketing Assistant, Marketing Operations <br />Division, Chevron, instigated a records search for the operational file <br />of the service station. According to Ms. Heath, Chevron normally <br />destroys site records 10 years after severing all relationships with the <br />site. The operational file for the site had apparently been destroyed; <br />however, copies were found of the contracts for the sale and disposal of <br />the three USTs after their removal. These contracts, dated January 6, <br />1976, are included in Attachment III. <br />Subsurface Investigation <br />On April 17, 1989, Versar representatives Mr. Kayo Dokken, <br />Geohydrologist, and Mr. R. Stephen Wilson, Geohydroiogist, conducted a <br />subsurface site assessment at the property. The investigation consisted <br />of the following two parts: (1) conducting a soil vapor survey at 10 <br />locations throughout the property, and (2) drilling and sampling of three <br />25 -foot boreholes. The locations of the soil vapor collection points and <br />the boreholes are shown in Figure 2, Attachment I. The drill permit <br />issued by the San Joaquin Local Health District is included in <br />Attachment IV. <br />The soil vapor data were obtained using a Xitech Vista 4000GLS soil <br />vapor probe and a Foxboro 128 organic vapor analyzer (OVA). At each <br />site, the vapor probe was advanced to a depth of two feet below the <br />surface where air was pumped from the soil and screened by the OVA. <br />Soil vapor readings ranged between zero and 1.5 parts per million (ppm) <br />.at all locations except for one, SV8, where seven ppm was detected. The <br />probe was subsequently advanced to five feet below the surface at SV8 <br />and organic vapors were not detected at that depth. <br />