My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000109
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AIRPORT
>
2651
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0543371
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000109
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2018 1:12:07 AM
Creation date
10/23/2018 1:16:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000109
FileName_PostFix
XR0000109
RECORD_ID
PR0543371
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0006174
FACILITY_NAME
Best Express Foods Inc.
STREET_NUMBER
2651
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AIRPORT
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16912003
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2651 S AIRPORT WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.� <br /> for indicator parameters, it may be appropriate to increase or decrease the number of wells for <br /> subsequent sampling <br /> It is intended that this sampling would be performed simultaneously with sampling already being <br /> conducted for dissolved contaminants. If dissolved contaminants are currently sampled <br /> quarterly, the biological indicator parameters should be sampled at the same frequency for one <br /> year Similar to the evaluation of contaminant concentration trends, it is useful to understand the <br /> influence of groundwater elevation on the indicator parameters. Upon evaluating the results of <br /> the initial monitoring event, it may be appropriate to discontinue certain indicator parameters. It <br /> may also be useful to include additional constituents, not shown in the above list, in subsequent <br /> monitoring. For example, methane and carbon dioxide, which do not occur in the list, may be <br /> included in this type of sampling program. Inclusion of methane and carbon dioxide is <br /> dependent on the availability of field instruments and the types of analytical methods performed <br /> by the laboratory. <br /> Section HI presents the sampling protocol and field/lab analytical methods for those indicator <br /> parameters not typically included in historical sampling programs. Considerable emphasis is <br /> given to dissolved oxygen, oxidation-reduction potential, and ferrous iron, because these <br /> rparameters are particularly sensitive to monitoring well purging and sampling techniques <br /> Section IV includes two case histones which illustrate a number of techniques which may be <br /> . used to evaluate field and laboratory data. This section includes graphs of biological indicator <br /> data and dissolved phase hydrocarbons <br /> There is no cost data provided in this protocol. The laboratory analytical costs for constituents <br /> such as ferrous iron, nitrate, and sulfate should be$10 to $20 per constituent per sampling event. <br /> Proper field sampling techniques for parameters such as dissolved oxygen and ferrous iron (field <br /> filtering) require a more labor intensive effort. Therefore, the incremental costs associated with <br /> field sampling for the indicator parameters will likely be at least as much as the laboratory <br /> analytical costs. - <br /> Finally, a glossary of definitions for commonly used analytical methods and a list of references <br /> appears at the end the document. The draft "Technical Protocol for Implementing Intrinsic <br /> Remediation", developed for the Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence (AFCEE), was <br /> particularly helpful in writing this Protocol. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.