My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000036
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AIRPORT
>
5000
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0543845
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000036
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2018 4:15:37 AM
Creation date
10/23/2018 4:50:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000036
FileName_PostFix
XR0000036
RECORD_ID
PR0543845
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0005867
FACILITY_NAME
STOCKTON METRO AIRPORT*
STREET_NUMBER
5000
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AIRPORT
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
17726034
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
5000 S AIRPORT WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Grp <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING, SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS <br /> On March 25, 2004, to comply with quarterly groundwater monitoring requirements, Ramage <br /> Environmental monitored and sampled two of the three wells Monitoring well MW-3 was not <br /> accessible, due to the presence of a parked car over the well <br /> 2.1 Groundwater Monitoring <br /> Depth-to-groundwater was measured in the two accessible wells to within 0 01-foot using a water <br /> level indicator The depth to the groundwater table ranged from 47 23 feet bgs in MW-2 to 47 50 <br /> feet bgs in MW-1 The corresponding groundwater surface elevations ranged from a high of <br /> 26 14 feet below mean sea level (msl) at MW-2 to a low of 26 24 feet below msl at MW-1 Since <br /> only two monitoring wells were accessible, a groundwater surface could not be derived, and <br /> groundwater flow and gradient characteristics could not be calculated The groundwater <br /> elevations and historical direction of groundwater flow are shown on Figure 3, and the <br /> groundwater monitoring data are summarized in Table 5 <br /> 2.2 Groundwater Sampling and Analysis <br /> Following groundwater level measurements, the wells were purged and sampled The wells were <br /> purged with a pump and dedicated disposable tubing until at least three well casing volumes had <br /> been removed and/or after groundwater temperature, pH and electrical conductivity values had <br /> stabilized Groundwater was sampled from the wells using disposable polyethylene bailers and <br /> laboratory-supplied containers Each sample container was transported in an iced cooler with <br /> chain-of-custody documentation to Excelchem Environmental Labs (Excelchem), a state of <br /> California certified hazardous waste testing laboratory (#2119) Excelchem analyzed each sample <br /> for TPH-as-het fuel, TPH-as-gasoline and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes (BTEX) by <br /> EPA Method 8020/8015M, and for methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), <br />' ethyl tertiary butyl ether (ETBE), tertiary amyl methyl ether (TAME), and tertiary butanol (TBA) by <br /> EPA Method 82608 The sample information field sheets are included in Appendix A <br /> The groundwater samples collected from both monitoring wells contained detectable <br /> concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons Oxygenate compounds including MTBE were not <br /> detected in either well The groundwater sample analytical results are summarized in Table 4, the <br /> concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater are posted on Figure 4, and the <br /> laboratory reports are included in Appendix B <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.