ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012542 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

,S yr m ri - r ' IAr - L4 f72M�Y - E of the tant, under Chain-of-Custody by Canonie Laboratory personel, (Exhibit F,) with instruct"" to be analyzed for BTX&E, TPH-13, EDD, �Yd sJ°fit and organic lead, as required by the SJLHD. Because of the fact that the hank was immediately adjacent to the pumps, no sample was taken "i tho fill line. Tiletank re Cubwitnessed by Jaime Favla moval and sampling r_46 (spm) of the SJL)-);1_ APProximately lh ic yards of soil ares removed from the excaVatinn- after the tank was pulled, and samples taken, the soil was returned to the hole. Approximately 7 cubic yards of clean fill was added to replace the p�.yL k,r volume occupied by the removed tank, and the site was grader the same day. returned to f, ,.p raP�• RESULTS �.r- SAMPLE ANALYSIS' r1�w The results of the laboratgr _- +� FrF are tatulat»d on Table I. All antestEdpcompanedntsnfrom the abaveal'IP1eZat ' 12;.-i the south end of the tank were below reportinc) limits; amounts of Ethylbenzene, very minor Xylene, and TfH were detected in the sample fv-om the north end of the tank. v. Cn October 7, 19B9 ➢ Jim Thorpe oil, Inc- wrote to the CRWOCB, .cy. 'Mating that the small amount of contamination in -;oil ail samples .� did not warrant further site investigation, and requested that tvj; Exhibit F_) As_ owners 6e rrlievr�d of any further work at the location; (refer tq Thorpe a domestic result of telephone conversations between Richard and Thomas Peltier of the CRWOEB, a sample was taken from the ic water well on the property, to Plate Vf,) bDr- John y John Bartell of MLLdrun E=nvironmental and anal Y Dr. ,j that for E]TX&J~, TPH-G, 1. EDD, and organic lead. The results revealed that all compon_nts were below reporting limits, table II list; the farm_ results in tabular x PLUME SITE AND CONFIGURATION: The writer did not witness the removal of the tank, but it was reported that no discoloration of soil was noted_ It appears that only a min:_rr- amount of spillage occurred, and that uch did not exist at this lgcatigna plume as s _ ESTIMATE= OF AMOUNT OF PRODUCT LEAKAGE_ The owners of the property are deceased, and to the writer': knowledge, there are no records available with which to determine the amount of fuel used during the time the tank was in place, or to estimate any spillage that may have occurred_ Because the tank was in eacellcat condition when removed, and no evidenco of leakage or soil discoloration was noted, it can be aysumod that ar.y product leakage was pump wa very minor amours As shown on Plates til, VII & ere VIII, the pumplocated immediately adjacent to the driveway. u It is most likely that any spills that might have occurred would f