Laserfiche WebLink
_ te,� � taster•��^w:;�..� �. t4.w� r afi x 3'*+.� '�, 'r"k ,.^W..�.�„s - � <br /> 4 -.ti ¢ter .�T• -!r "tA `Rr r/ fi �'~ r�-.-; -c"sTi" -^'�`T" N �'' aV .�� &n-. y r p�`1 F 41 '° 4:.r, 'Ibfizl <br /> �� '�/7.. jr E,° .'� ', "..x '-F' �` " •: n'ASF f.. S. ts._ y'y"`:.='�J�""''s:F;. —": ; `..+�. ..✓ t�rr�''?�' fpsa .� ".."i. <br /> T r" $ raIk rtes <br />� �„#. -� f�i '.c`. � �G;.xU -'�.' *r # f�F"`a' r�' �-+�� cy �. �!� .�-� r..�` i � '�•� "Y�_ a � ! laray � �% ..Y � �� <br />������T � j �. ,���' ^c=5� -� �'�` s� ��'�i°"4 �- � „�_�'s�- :• -�.'t a�� �::titirt' ��_,r,�.�i-� � � .:.��ti. -,mow - � .� <br /> ts� ` <br /> e <br /> .iry <br /> have been during refueling of vehicles and would have been contained <br /> by the retaining wall and driveway, and promptly clzaned up. <br /> SUMMARY: <br /> 1. The UST that was removed from the property appeared to be in <br /> excellent condition; there was no visible evidence of soil <br /> discoloration when the tank Vas removed. <br /> yr <br /> 2. The so:;l sample from the south end <br /> clean, of the tank, (7$,) tested <br /> ' <br /> - The sample from the north and of the tank had relatively low <br /> levels of EDB, Xylone, and TVPH. <br /> 4. A chemical analysis of a water sample obtained from the private <br /> well on the property located approximately 75 feet from the tank <br /> site showed that tests for BTX&E. EDD, TAH-C, and Organic lead were <br /> all below reporting limits.. <br /> 5. There was no ,evidence of water or moisture in the hole during <br /> ar <br /> ti after excavation. <br /> CONCLUSIONS <br /> i <br /> Based on the above data, it appears that additional work at this <br /> site is not warranted. <br /> Yours truly <br /> William J. Hunter <br /> cc: Margaret Russell <br /> Thorpe ail <br />