My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001782
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHURCH
>
17
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506167
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001782
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2018 10:44:54 AM
Creation date
10/25/2018 10:30:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001782
FileName_PostFix
XR0001782
RECORD_ID
PR0506167
PE
2959
FACILITY_ID
FA0007245
FACILITY_NAME
GUILD CLEANERS
STREET_NUMBER
17
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
CHURCH
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
04303206
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
17 S CHURCH ST
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Revised LFR Levine-Fricke <br /> to select the optimum vacuum to be used in the constant rate test for each well Step <br /> tests will be conducted on one of the My screened extraction wells (FSEW-3) and all <br /> three partially screened wells in partially screened extraction well cluster PSEW-4, 5, <br /> and 5- Vacuum responses will be measured in all other monitoring wells <br /> The step test will begun with a vacuum of approximately 20 inches of water column <br /> ("m-DxO") apple at the extraction well If no response is observed in any adjacent <br /> monitoring well, the vacuum will be stepped tip in regular increases until a response is <br /> observed in a monitoring well. A response is defined as I percent of the extraction <br /> pressure, or a mmimuin of 0.05 in H2O vacuum Each subsequent step will be taken <br /> only when monitoring well responses remain stable for two sequential readings obtained <br /> five minutes apart. The step sequence will be continued until the operational capacity of <br /> the blower is maxiinized <br /> As presented in Table 1, field VOC monitoring (using Tedlar bags and a handheld <br /> photomnization detector JPID] or organic vapor analyzer)will be conducted frequently <br /> during the early portion of each step in the vacuum step tests_ This is clone to establish <br /> an adequate data set of VOC removal rates cinder rapidly changing SVE conditions <br /> Laboratory samples will be collected at the end of each step (one per step) to correlate <br /> with PID readings Vacuum responses will also be recorded at each monitoring well <br /> more frequently at the beginning of each step, and then at a logarithmically decreasing <br /> rate over urne because the rate of vacuum response typically decreases with tilde at a <br /> corresponding rate <br /> 5.3.3 Constant Rate Test <br /> A,constant rate test will be performed once the step test is completed and an optimum <br /> flowivacuum combination is determined Constant rate tests will be conducted on <br /> FSEW-3 and PSEW-4, 5, and 6 Vacuum responses will be measured in other <br /> monitoring wells. <br /> The goals of the constant rate tests are as follows <br /> • Collect pressure and concentration data for the design sizing of blowers and <br /> treatment components for the longer duration Phase II pilot test <br /> • detemune flow rates and pressure response differences (if any) between the filly <br /> screened extraction and the partially screened extraction wells <br /> • determine the Icing-terin equilibrium pressure distribution and estimate the are-iof <br /> influence for each extraction well <br /> • collect adequate data to allow calculation of average air permeability and resultant <br /> air flow. or pore volume flushes required to effectively remediate VOC-affected <br /> soil <br /> • monitor the changes in VOC concentrations over tune, to develop an understanding <br /> of the maximum mass removal rates for design of long-tenni treatment options <br /> wp"WEC&-�L'Wi-nv-081x3 d%Ifs Page is <br /> Obi£T d S£TOP91760ZT 01 906P ZS9 OTS 3NO1 ;J �NIOTI MAI dd 82 9T Z0, 68 inr <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.