Laserfiche WebLink
P.O. Box 8 0 8, L- 7 9 0, Livermore, CA 94 5 5 1 <br />0141K..'. 12, Ell --2' 02 <br />April 1994 <br />his letter is to update the community on environmental projects and issues at the Lawrence Livermore <br />National Laboratory (LLNL). The University of California manages the LLNL Livermore Site and Site <br />300 for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). LLNL and DOE have a number of programs underway to <br />ensure that LLNL operations are environmentally sound and protective of both employee and community health. <br />These programs include initiatives to reduce the overall amount and toxicity of wastes produced by Laboratory <br />operations. Under the federal Superfund program, DOE/LLNL are addressing problems linked to past handling <br />and storage of hazardous and radioactive materials at the Livermore Site and Site 300. All environmental pro- <br />grams are overseen by state and federal regulatory agencies. M <br />Cleanup Priorities <br />For = <br />Livermore Site <br />Allocating limited dollars for future cleanup <br />activities became a reality this year. DOE <br />funding for Livermore Site cleanup activities <br />will probably not be enough over the next <br />few years to meet schedules set earlier. Work- <br />ing with the regulatory agencies, LLNL <br />developed a two-pronged strategy aimed at <br />capturing the contaminated ground water <br />plume on its western and southern borders <br />and completing detailed studies of potentially <br />contaminated areas on site. A lengthy task list <br />was prepared to support the selected strategy, <br />recognizing restoration activities already <br />underway that would be costly to cancel or <br />delay. The ranking of the tasks was based on <br />their contribution to reducing risk to public <br />health. On March 11, the Community Work <br />Group (CWG) met to review the strategy and <br />offer advice on task priorities. The CWG <br />members present agreed in general with the <br />strategy and priorities. They also expressed <br />disappointment with the prospect of decreased <br />funding for cleanup by DOE. The end result of <br />this activity is that there is now an approved list <br />of cleanup activities that will be done in order of <br />priority as funds become available from DOE <br />over the next few years. The original estimate of <br />53 years for the overall cleanup has not changed. Lo <br />Site 300 Cleanup News <br />A potpourri of activities characterized envi- <br />ronmental restoration efforts at Site 300 over <br />the past few months. DOE/LLNL responded <br />to regulatory comments on the Draft Site - <br />Wide Remedial Investigation report and the <br />Draft Final Site -Wide Remedial Investiga- <br />tion report has been submitted. LLNL is <br />looking at making the report available on <br />CD ROM to regulatory agencies. A pilot <br />ground water treatment system at one of the <br />Site's work areas was restarted, promising a <br />test bed for innovative technologies applied to <br />site cleanup. Prioritization of cleanup tasks <br />has been completed and a revised schedule of <br />deliverables has been negotiated with the <br />regulatory a&encies. Other ongoing work <br />includes studies of ground water contaminants <br />and archeological site characterization . Drilling <br />of additional monitor wells adjacent to the <br />southeast corner of the Site began in late March. Ll <br />Recyclable <br />