Laserfiche WebLink
Insoection Reocrt <br />Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories <br />Site 3G0 <br />Inspection date - October 28 and 29, 2003 <br />find anything in my regulations or statutes that would clearly define this as a violation, however I added that <br />the Department does require manifests to be completely filled out. (Note: I have placed a copy of a letter from <br />the Department which provides information about manifest errors, incomplete or improperly completed <br />manifests, see Attachment M.) Mr. Lane stated that he acknowledged that they have an issue that needs to <br />be addressed with respect to communicating the information regarding the handling codes to the group <br />responsible for checking manifest for completeness and sending the copies back to the generator and to the <br />Department. <br />We also discussed my review .of the Post -Closure Permit and the Operating Plan for Bldg. 829. 1 explained <br />that it was my understanding that they were to have a training plan, outlining the training requirements for the <br />person(s) responsible for conducting inspections of the cap at Bldg. 829. This would include training on the <br />inspection plan, inspection requirements, inspection logs, observations to be made, tracking any repairs that <br />may be needed and other details as would be pertinent to observations made during inspections of the cap. It <br />was explained to me that the guidance documents provided by the Department for preparing the Part B <br />application for a Post -Closure Permit did not require a training plan. I stated that I would be discussing this <br />with my management back in Berkeley. I stated that once the issue was resolved they would be notified of the <br />outcome. <br />Details of the locations visited were provided, and I explained that I would send them a report within sixty five <br />days from today. I asked if they had any question. Mr. Lane said that at this time it appears that we have <br />gone over things very well and that there were no further questions. I gave Mr. Lane the Summary of <br />Observations to review and sign. After receiving the original signed Summary of Observations, I again <br />thanked everyone for their cooperation and courtesy. This concluded my inspection. <br />December 8, 2003 <br />I notified Mr. Stan Terusaki, who is my main contact person for LLNLS300, that the issue regarding the <br />manifest handling codes is no longer an issue. There are no statutes or regulations covering the responsibility <br />of the TSDF other than signing the manifest and sending the required copies to the generator and to the <br />Department. Additional information regarding manifest errors and manifests returned by the Department to <br />the responsible parties that submitted the manifest has been provided as an attachment to this report <br />(Attachment M). The statute referred to in the letter is Health and Safety Code 25160.5. This section provides <br />