Laserfiche WebLink
Inspection Report <br />requested a copy of the current/approved training plan and matrix. On August 30, 2005, 1 received fax from Mr <br />Terusaki. The fax was included a copy of the current/approved training matrix. See attachment F (26). <br />Based on my review of the training plan, records and the additional records provided, there were no violations <br />discovered at this time. <br />Unresolved issue since the Department October 28, and 29, 2003 Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI) <br />I reviewed also the training plan for Building 829, which is operating under a Post -Closure permit. I observed that <br />the Part B Operating Plan did not contain a training plan. Post -Closure permits are not the same as permits issued <br />to active operating hazardous waste units. Each permit is unit specific. Regulations require that training be a part of <br />any permit issued, which includes a post -closure permit. Under the current circumstances, the post -closure permit <br />issued to LLNL S 300 for Building 829 does not contain references to training requirements. However, it does <br />reference and require an inspection plan and inspections of the post -closure unit, Building 829. The Department <br />requires a training plan to include training on inspection of hazardous waste units, active or inactive. The training <br />should include training requirements, course content, frequency, and who is required to take this training with <br />respect to conducting the required Inspections of Building 829 and the area covered by the Post -Closure permit. <br />This violation was cited in the previous inspection. LLNL site 300 responded and that submittal is currently under <br />review. This situation is listed as an unresolved issue under Section VI. Violations. <br />d. Incident Report: <br />No reportable incident had occurred. <br />On July 21, 2005, San Francisco Chronicle reported that a large grass fire penetrated into and burned about 200 <br />acres of outdoor the explosives treatment site at LLNL Site 300 on July 19 and July 20, 2005. On August 18, 2005, <br />Mr. Brocales contacted Mr. Terusaki, via an e-mail and requested information regarding the grass fire at LLNL S <br />300. The information requested included if hazardous waste storage areas were affected, was the contingency pan <br />implemented, what areas were affected and was the Department notified. <br />On August 19, 2005, Mr. Brocales, received an e-mail from Mr. Terusaki with responses to Mr. Brocales's <br />questions. Mr. Terusaki stated that none of the hazardous waste management areas, including the satellite <br />accumulation areas, waste accumulation areas, EWSF, EWTF, B 883, and the post -closure facilitywere affected. <br />In addition, none of the 829 monitoring wells were affected. He also stated in his e-mail that there were two fires at <br />LLNL S 300: one smaller fire that occurred on July 4 and a larger fire which occurred on July 19. Mr. Terusaki <br />stated that he talked with Mr. Andy Berna-Hicks, Standardized Permitting and Corrective Action Branch, about the <br />Page 8 of 20 <br />