My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000050
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
ALMONDWOOD
>
5151
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0543386
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000050
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/31/2018 3:27:30 PM
Creation date
10/31/2018 2:35:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000050
FileName_PostFix
XR0000050
RECORD_ID
PR0543386
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003791
FACILITY_NAME
TUFF BOY INC
STREET_NUMBER
5151
STREET_NAME
ALMONDWOOD
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
MANTECA
Zip
95337
APN
22606017
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
5151 ALMONDWOOD DR
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> Mr Martin Harris <br /> Page 2 of 7 <br />• ethylbenzene and total xylenes at levels exceeding the respective laboratory detection limits Soil <br /> analytical results are summarized in Table 1 ! <br /> Sensitive Receptor Survey <br /> At the request of the San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (EHD), the property <br /> owner and Ground Zero conducted a survey of production and/or domestic wells within 2000 feet <br /> of the site Approximately fifteen wells (domestic and irrigation) are Iocated within 2000 feet of <br /> the site <br /> The nearest water supply wells are the former facility well located approximately 220 feet <br /> northwest (downgradient) of the former UST and a neighboring domestic well located <br /> approximately 125 feet southeast (upgradient) of the former UST The former facility well is no <br /> longer used by the facility, but is maintained as an emergency fire suppression well The facility <br /> currently utilizes a newer well at the northern boundary of the property approximately 500 feet <br /> north of the former UST All three of the wells mentioned above were sampled for gasoline <br /> constituents on September 26, 2003 No gasoline constituents, including benzene or MTBE, were <br /> detected in these water supply wells <br /> Subsurface Investigations <br /> i <br />• Ground Zero supervised the drilling of three soil borings on December 17, 1999 to investigate <br /> the extent of soil and groundwater contamination in the vicinity of the former UST Results of ! <br /> the investigation indicated that soil and groundwater had been impacted from an unauthorized <br /> release of gasoline Residual soil contamination appeared to be limited vertically to a depth of <br /> less than 15 feet below ground surface (bgs), but monitoring wells were necessary to evaluate the <br /> extent of groundwater contamination <br /> Ground Zero installed and sampled four groundwater monitoring wells in January 2001 and <br /> initiated quarterly groundwater monitoring and sampling to investigate the lateral extent of <br /> groundwater contamination at the site Based upon the analytical results of soil and groundwater <br /> samples collected at the site through March 2002, Ground Zero submitted a formal request for <br /> site closure as a low risk groundwater case in correspondence dated June 18, 2002 EHD <br /> disagreed with Ground Zero's recommendation and requested additional investigation, including <br /> additional shallow monitoring wells and an investigation of the vertical extent of soil and _ <br /> groundwater contamination <br /> Pursuant to a directive from EHD three additional groundwater monitoring wells were installed, <br /> and one deep soil boring was advanced in January 2004 to further investigate the vertical and lateral <br /> extent of contamination Based upon this additional investigation, Ground Zero concluded that the <br /> vertical extent of groundwater contamination had been defined and the downgradient extent of <br /> contamination in the shallow aquifer had been essentially defined <br />• <br /> G 1Gt20UNDZF%Tuttl3oy1Rcporls\Qh1R120051IQM2005 doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.