COMPLIANCE INFO - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

asked him if there was any emergency decontamination equipment onsite and training records for employees who handle hazardous waste. He said there was nothing like this at site because they did not need it. told him the waste oil was hazardous waste and Mr. Hardin said that it was removed by an oil recycling service from the site. He ended by saying he would see that I got copies of all hazardous waste manifests from this site (and offsite locations along tracks). On July 30, 1993, this department received copies of manifests for hazardous waste generated through AT&S Diamond & East Worth site number for 1992 and up to present for 1993. Also received were receipts from Patterson for waste oil pumped from tank onsite and several manifests for hazardous waste with different EPA site I.D. numbers. Several manifests were difficult to read. Mr. Hardin phoned and told me copies of manifests are now available at the Diamond & East Worth site. Total tonnage for 1992 calculated off these manifests/receipts was 14.78 tons. It was impossible to determine from records the identity of hazardous wastes cleaned up at different locations offsite. Very little or no information on the following was available for inspection: - Where and how spills occurred - How spills were cleaned up - Who cleaned up spills - How hazardous waste from spills was contained, labelled, and transported I made another site visit on August 12, 1993 to get more information on waste oil tank. I spoke to Wayne Hale and Clarence Jones and told them the underground tank was subject to regulation under Title 22. 1 explained that this tank needs to be monitored for leakage. In July and August following this inspection, I communicated several times with Alan Ito (DTSC), Wayne Hale, and Clarence Jones (AT&S Diamond & East Worth contact, and Mr. Mick Hardin (Southern California AT&S contact) to get further information for this report. c: Tim Naprawa, Cal -EPA, Department of Toxic Substances Control 0