Laserfiche WebLink
TABLE A-2 <br />Monitor Well Purge Data <br />December 16 and 17, 1993 <br />Well/Sample <br />Total Depth <br />(teet)' <br />Presence of <br />Floating Product <br />Three Well Volumes <br />(gallons) <br />Purged Volume <br />(gallons) <br />MW -1 <br />884 <br />no <br />72 <br />75 <br />MW -2 <br />86 7 <br />no <br />64 <br />65 <br />MW -3 <br />906 <br />no <br />8 7 <br />90 <br />MW -4 <br />1082 <br />no <br />180 <br />180 <br />MW -5 <br />1054 <br />no <br />167 <br />167 <br />MW -6 <br />1067 <br />no <br />180 <br />180 <br />I Measured from top of PVC c,atiina (TOC) <br />At the beginning, during, and end of the purge process, measurements were taken for pH, <br />electrical conductivity, and temperature of the purge water The values measured at the end of <br />the purge process are presented in Table A-3 <br />TABLE A-3 <br />Groundwater Parameter Values, (End of Purge) <br />December 16 and 17, 1993 <br />Well/Sample <br />pH <br />Temperature (° F) <br />Conductivity (umhos) <br />MW -1 <br />7 33 <br />57 4 <br />875 <br />MW -2 <br />7 15 <br />59 0 <br />885 <br />MW -3 <br />724 <br />57 5 <br />855 <br />MW -4 <br />759 <br />58 7 <br />765 <br />MW -5 <br />7 89 <br />60 8 <br />812 <br />MW -6 <br />772 <br />55 3 <br />786 <br />Sampling Procedure and Analysis Schedule <br />A sampling order was established prior to this sampling round, based on analytical results from <br />the last quarter samples The wells were sampled in the following order <br />M\RP'rN\AREGAQTR WP <br />1 MW -4 <br />2 MW -5 <br />3 MW -3 <br />4 MW -6 <br />5 MW -1 <br />6 MW -2 <br />A - 2 OV -14/94 <br />