Laserfiche WebLink
MEMORANDUM <br /> TO <br /> t Barbara Coler, Chief a , <br /> Ca /EPA Statewide Cleanup Operations Division Fetewdtoo <br /> DISC, Region 2 GovC1Oor <br /> Central Valley 700 Heinz Avenue, Suite 200 <br /> Regional water Berkeley, CA 94710-2737 <br /> Quality Control <br /> Board <br /> 3443 Routier Road <br /> FROM: Thommasas R. Pinkos <br /> Suite <br /> Sacramento,CA Assistant Executive Officer <br /> 95827.3098 <br /> (916) 255-3000 DATA t 23 January 1997 <br /> FAX (916) 255-3015 <br /> BIIBJYCT: 1, 4-DIOXANE <br /> Based on the discussion at our meeting on Monday, 6 January <br /> 1997, I will revise my memorandum dated 20 December 1996 as <br /> follows: <br /> Staff of the Central Valley Regional Board will regulate <br /> dioxane in generally the same manner as any other constituent <br /> that may affect water quality or beneficial uses. Therefore <br /> staff will proceed in accordance with the following guidance: <br /> 1. 1, 4-Dioxane should be analyzed and reported at sites <br /> where there is a reasonable expectation that it may be <br /> present (e.g. , at locations with high chlorinated solvent <br /> concentrations in groundwater, since 1, 4-dioxane is added <br /> to chlorinated solvent as a stabilizer; 1, 4-dioxane has <br /> been detected in groundwater at Aerojet, Southern <br /> Pacific's Sacramento Rail Yard and other sites in Region <br /> 5 where solvents were extensively used and spilled) . <br /> Such analysis and reporting should generally result in no <br /> added cost since it will usually accompany the analysis <br /> and reporting of a target solvent, if the appropriate <br /> method is chosen (see below) . <br /> If the analysis and reporting of dioxane will result in a <br /> significant additional cost to the responsible party, <br /> then staff should evaluate such cost against the benefit <br /> and value of the added analysis. The current Proposition <br /> 65 regulatory level for 1, 4-dioxane of 15 gg/l in water <br /> and the Cal/EPA cancer potency factor, which is <br /> equivalent to 1.3 µg/l at the 1-in-a-million risk level, <br /> are based on standard toxicologic scaling from laboratory <br /> animals to humans . Recent information on differences in <br /> the metabolism of 1, 4-dioxane by laboratory animals and <br /> humans indicates that the above numerical criteria may be <br /> overly conservative. Cal/EPA's Office of Environmental <br /> Health Hazard Assessment has been requested to review <br /> Recycled Paper Our ini cion is to preserve and enhance the quality of California's <br /> water resources for the benefit of present and fume generations. <br />