Laserfiche WebLink
G�O <br /> CO <br /> Beth Pratt <br /> February 27 <br /> , X993 <br /> � 3 f <br /> DOPACO Gardbafla Inc. MAR g 1993 <br /> 4545 Quantas Lane- <br /> S"tocton, CA 952U6 ENVIRONMENTAL HIALTH <br /> F*F-RMITi5ERvrr-L"' <br /> _Wbiec'b Ghernica! Analysis. <br /> n: At y <br /> our request we an two samples to determine chemical <br /> icon. The first sample is in a tall bone and is icorrta�n naii <br /> 93A-0036, the <br /> ed p <br /> compos soma c IM_s COGNIis derctified as <br /> second sample. m a short bode and appears to <br /> co27, 'I993- <br /> CpGNiS 93A-�37. Both samples were received on February <br /> goat samples c�n}".�►z rnGS`�','rammer Y'rth some lr'�C���maple R93A�36 sugar <br /> is 0.0 <br /> or polysaccharide- The solids rem samples <br /> astpled that sample 93A-�7 cortins more <br /> only dferenm sound between <br /> the two <br /> sump P <br /> oI acchande relatNe carbonate when compared to sample 93A-�36. There is no <br /> P � col resent. Ethylene glycol is the main component of most antiYreeze <br /> ethylene glycol p <br /> products. The dirt was not analyzed in Sample 93A-0Q37. <br /> I - Inspectra were obtained using a Digifab FTS-60 lr frr red System <br /> equipped with a "Circle CeUu. <br /> ,g The samples were run as is using the using the cin e ill. This e. (10 ) sa that <br /> the concerrtraiion of any material other than watery isthat ry lth ler, giycollis �(�ae samplpese <br /> ow <br /> of ethylene glycol for reference, this determined y <br /> I dried portions of the samples at S0°C. and analyzed the r5sidues as KBr pellets. The <br /> same material was found in both sample residues. <br /> Future Work None planned. <br /> =Mahlb4ergI, <br /> ohn Project Manager <br /> C OGNIS, ins - 2330 Circadian way - Sang Rosa, CA 9W7 <br /> (7U7)575-7155 - Fac (707) 575.7833 <br />