My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REMOVAL_1991
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHARTER
>
710
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0540518
>
REMOVAL_1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2020 11:52:47 AM
Creation date
11/2/2018 4:50:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
REMOVAL
FileName_PostFix
1991
RECORD_ID
PR0540518
PE
2381
FACILITY_ID
FA0002547
FACILITY_NAME
QUEEN OF SHEBA #2
STREET_NUMBER
710
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
CHARTER
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16717002
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
710 E CHARTER WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\C\CHARTER\710\PR0540518\REMOVAL 1991.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
VP <br /> grease separator for a meat market, and was never intended for <br /> waste oil . <br /> on the morning of 3/12/91, Telic telephoned Larry Williams <br /> with SMUD and he informed Telic that the standard closure for sand <br /> traps in the Stockton area was to have them pumped out (the <br /> contents could be disposed of at Sacramento Regional Waste Control <br /> as non hazardous and without manifest) , filled with sand and capped <br /> with concrete. Mr . Williams was informed of the RWQCB <br /> recommendations for sump closure, and he admitted their <br /> recommendations had precedence over his . <br /> Also on 3/12/91 , Robert Noyes, Telic Project Manager, met with <br /> Mr. Jerry Gregor'son and Alfonso Lopez to discuss the proper way of <br /> closing the sump that would be most cost effective. Statements <br /> that surfaced in the meeting were: <br /> 1 . Telic was trying to take advantage of Gregorson by doing <br /> more than was necessary. <br /> 2 . Telic was not willing to provide a signed closure report <br /> without analyzing soil beneath the tank, per RWQCB <br /> advice . <br /> It was then decided that Gregorson would see if another <br /> contractor, who .proposed a drastically reduced price, would be able <br /> to provide a closure report that was acceptable to the lender. <br /> They would let Telic know of their outcome. <br /> i <br /> On 3/13/91 Robert Noyes with Telic again contacted Mr. Charlie <br /> Hunt with SJCEHD and explained to him the predicament that Telic <br /> was in regarding the sump closure: . <br /> 1 . Telic ' s clients, Gregorson, felt they were being taken <br /> advantage of . <br /> 2 . Larry Williams with SMUD thought Telic was planning to <br /> do much more than is normally necessary on a sump <br /> closure. <br /> 3 . RWQCB, Ms Williams, thought we should abide by SJCEHD <br /> Tank Closure Requirements, but did not want to get <br /> directly involved. <br /> 4 . SJCEHD no longer wants to be involved or provide any <br /> direction in regards to the proper closure, nor will they <br /> sign off on the closure. <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.