REMOVAL_1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

'r ?y' �r 2 . 0 CLOSURE ACTIVITIES Upon subject contract signature on 2/20/91 by the client, TELIC ENGINEERING proceeded on Scope of Work Task I (acquiring permits) . On 3/7/91, Telic received a call from Charlie Hunt with SJCEHD stating that Telic had to make some corrections in the application and that tank registration fees in the amount of $1 , 032 . 00 must be paid prior to permit approval . Telic questioned the necessity of a tank registration fee for a sump. Charlie Hunt informed Telic that if there were inlet and Outlet pipes connected to the subject sump that no registration fees or permit from SJCEHD would be necessary. On 3/8/91 Telic Engineering manually probed the sump (as the inlets and outlets were not visible) and discovered an inlet and outlet. Charlie Hunt SJCEHD was immediately informed of this fact and he then referred Telic to the Stockton Municipal Utility District (SMUD), Larry Williams, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) , Cam Williams . On 3/8/91 , Larry Williams with SMUD was contacted by phone. He agreed to investigate the subject sump and advise Telic of his recommendations for closure. On 3/11/91 , Telic contacted Cam Williams with the State of California RWQCB. Telic explained to Ms Williams the circumstances surrounding the subject sump. Her advice on properly closing the sump was to follow the SJCEHD quidelines for tank removal and submit to her a final closing report, with soil analysis findings . She stated that Telic' s closure report may never be reviewed, but would be put on file to document the closure. On 3/11/91, Telic pumped out and drummed the contents of the sump to visually inspect the sumps interior. At this point, the client requested that Telic cease from doing any more work on the sump, until it was determined if a more cost effective means of closure would be appropriate. They were advised by SMUD that the contracted closure plan with Telic was an "Overkill" and they discovered from a prior tenant that the sump was installed as a 3