My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2003 - 2007
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHEROKEE
>
610
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0521866
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2003 - 2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2021 3:49:10 PM
Creation date
11/2/2018 5:10:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2003 - 2007
RECORD_ID
PR0521866
PE
2371
FACILITY_ID
FA0014852
FACILITY_NAME
RANCHO SAN MIGUEL MARKET*
STREET_NUMBER
610
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
CHEROKEE
STREET_TYPE
Ln
City
Lodi
Zip
95240
APN
04745039
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
610 S Cherokee Ln
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\C\CHEROKEE\612\PR0521866\COMPLIANCE INFO 2003 - 2007 .PDF
QuestysFileName
COMPLIANCE INFO 2003 - 2007
QuestysRecordDate
10/28/2016 6:58:12 PM
QuestysRecordID
3244411
QuestysRecordType
12
QuestysStateID
1
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> Software Version Installed: 3 2— <br /> CoMplete the following checklist: <br /> Yes ❑ No* Is the audible alarm operational? <br /> es ❑ No* Is the visual alarm operational? <br /> es ❑ No* Were all sensors visuallyinspected, fimetionall tested,and confirmed operational? <br /> Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br /> not interfere with thew proper operation? <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ o* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) <br /> N/A operational? <br /> Yes ❑ No* For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> ❑ N/A monitoring system detects a leak, fails to opera or is electrically disco ted? If yes: which sensors initiate <br /> positive shut-down? (Check all that apply) Sump/Trench Sensors; Dispenser Cgatainment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? Jd Yes; ❑No. <br /> Yes ❑ No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no <br /> ❑ N/A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br /> fill ins and operating ro rl ? If so,at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? 95 % <br /> ❑ Yes* No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors,probes, or other equipment replaced <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E,below. <br /> ❑ Yes* No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) ❑ <br /> Product; ❑ Water. If yes,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> V ❑es <br /> No* Was monitoringsystem set-upreviewed to ensure proper settings?Attach set u reports, if applicable <br /> Yes ❑ No* Is all monitoring equipment oerational per manufacturer's specifications? <br /> * In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: <br /> Page 2 of 3 03/01 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.