COMPLIANCE INFO 2001 - 2009 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

t On July 12, 2004, Mr. Jackson called Ms. Galindo and asked why a primary line tightness test, which was a condition of the SR0037495 approval letter, had not been scheduled. Ms. Galindo stated she would look into it. Mr. Kurt Denney of Stockton Service Station Equipment Company called Mr. Jackson the following day and stated that a primary line tightness test was scheduled to be performed by AffordaTest on July 20, 2004. The line was tested and passed (Attachment 11). On September 10, 2004, Mr. Jackson performed a routine LIST inspection (Attachment 12) and witnessed the annual monitoring system certification and spill container testing by Redwine Testing (Attachment 13). No violations were found and all components tested passed inspection. On September 28, 2005, Mr. Jackson performed a routine LIST inspection (Attachment 14) and witnessed the annual monitoring system certification by Shirley Environmental Testing (Attachment 15). During the review of the facility's files, Mr. Jackson found that only one employee was trained by the designated operator, and this facility operates 24 hours daily. Spill container testing was not performed, and secondary containment testing was due by the end of the month. On October 28, 2005, secondary containment and spill container testing was performed one month late by Shirley Environmental Testing. All components tested passed and a report was submitted to the EHD (Attachment 16). On November 7, 2005, return to compliance certification was submitted with copies of the October 28, 2005, secondary containment and spill container test report, and a copy of the designated operator employee training records (Attachment 17). On September 12, 2006, Mr. Muniappa Naidu, REHS, EHD, performed a routine UST inspection (Attachment 18) and witnessed the annual monitoring system certification. A copy of the facility's best management practices for the operation of the UST system was not found on site. Later that day, Mr. Scott Covey, Shirley Environmental, Corporation, submitted a list of their designated operator personnel (Attachment 19). All components tested had passed and a report was submitted to the EHD (Attachment 20). The spill container was not tested because the service technician was not prepared. Spill container testing was due by October 2006 and was not performed in 2006. On October 30, 2007, Mr. Garrett Backus, REHS, EHD, performed a routine UST inspection (Attachment 21). The annual monitoring system certification and spill container testing had not been scheduled and were one month past due for the annual monitoring system certification and 12 months past due for the spill container testing. During a review of the facility's files, the monitoring and response plans, maintenance and monitoring records, designated operator monthly inspection reports, and employee training records by the designated operator were not found. On November 6, 2007, a designated operator statement was submitted to this office identifying Darren Rieck as the designated operator(Attachment 22). On November 26, 2007, Mr. Backus witnessed the annual monitoring system certification and spill container testing by LeMesnager Engineering (Attachment 23). The remote monitoring system that sends alarms from the monitoring panel to Kansas was not operational. Mr. Backus left an inspection report on site (Attachment 24). 3