COMPLIANCE INFO 2001 - 2009 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

purposes only and did not meet triennial secondary containment testing requirements because the EHD was not notified prior to testing. On December 16, 2003, Mr. Jackson called and spoke with Ms. Nora Galindo, Environmental and Health Manager for Sprint. Ms. Galindo stated that they fired Shirley Environmental Testing and hired L.A. Perks to make the necessary repairs. Ms. Galindo also stated that L.A. Perks will submit a permit application for repairs. On January 26, 2004, Ms. Galindo submitted a package of completed forms that were requested during the November 13, 2003, routine UST inspection. The cover letter stated a current UST — Facility (former Form A) was included, but was not part of the submittal (Attachment 5). On January 26, 2004, a permit application, SR0036721, was submitted by L.A. Perks to repair the secondary containment failures. This permit was approved by Mr. Jackson on January 30, 2004 (Attachment 6). On March 3, 2004, Ms. Michelle Le, REHS, EHD, received a call from Randy of L.A. Perks stating that the failures were too extensive to be repaired and that the piping needed to be replaced. He also commented that he would not put his name on such a patch job and had covered up the pipe and was leaving the job site. According to Randy, Sprint would rebid the job as a piping removal/install. On March 4, 2004, Ms. Le called and asked Ms. Galindo about the secondary containment repairs. Ms. Galindo said she would choose a contractor by the next day and submit a permit application to the EHD. On April 6, 2004, a permit application, SR0037495, was submitted by Stockton Service Station Equipment Company, Inc. to repair the failed secondary containment components and was approved by Mr. Jackson on April 16, 2004 (Attachment 7). On May 11, 2004, photos were taken of portions of the piping as they were uncovered for repairs (Attachment 8). On May 26, 2004, Mr. Jackson witnessed the pressure soap test of the two secondary lines and verified the appropriate slope of the piping, which was not required for this type of repair. One of the lines did not hold pressure; the other passed. On May 28, 2004, Mr. Jackson witnessed the retest of the secondary lines. Mr. Randy Chadwick and Mr. Mike Jones of Stockton Service Station Equipment Company stated that a leak was found on the piping near the piping sump. The fitting was replaced and both lines were retested and passed. Photos were taken of the repairs (Attachment 9). On June 9, 2004, Mr. Jackson received a call from Mr. Eric Vannamaan of RIC Construction. Mr. Vannamaan stated that his company hired Stockton Service Station Equipment Company to repair the secondary failures and requested Mr. Jackson provide a statement that the failures have been repaired. Mr. Jackson stated he would send an inspection report indicating what he witnessed. On June 11, 2004, Mr. Jackson faxed Mr. Vannamaan the inspection report(Attachment 10). 2