Laserfiche WebLink
(B) Restrict delivery of flow to the tank at least 30 minutes before the tank overfills, <br /> provided the restriction occurs when the tank is filled to no more than 95 percent of <br /> capacity; and activate an audible alarm at least five minutes before the tank overfills; <br /> or <br /> (C) Provide positive shut-off of flow to the tank when the tank is filled to no more than <br /> 95 percent of capacity; or, <br /> (D) Provide positive shut-off of flow to the tank so that none of the fittings located on the <br /> top of the tank are exposed to product due to overfilling. <br /> —> The facility had selected option C as the form of overfill prevention. The overfill <br /> prevention system for the 87 and 89 octane tanks were manually overridden with <br /> measuring sticks at the time of the August 19, 2004, routine UST inspection and were <br /> not functioning in accordance with this section. The sticks were removed by the <br /> service technician that day. <br /> Title 22, CCR 2636 (c)(1) All releases in secondary piping flow to a collection sump. <br /> Primary piping in contact with hazardous substances under normal operating conditions <br /> shall be installed inside a secondary containment system which may be a secondary pipe, <br /> vault, or a lined trench. All secondary containment systems shall be sloped so that all <br /> releases will flow to a collection sump located at the low point of the underground piping. <br /> --> The 91 octane piping within the turbine sump was found with a test boot in place <br /> at the time of the August 19, 2004 inspection, which would have prevented a release <br /> from flowing into the collection sump. The test boot was pulled back by the service <br /> technician during the inspection. <br /> Title 23, CCR 2637 Secondary containment test performed. Secondary containment <br /> systems installed on or after January 1, 2001 shall be tested upon installation, 6 months <br /> after installation, and every 36 months thereafter. Secondary containment systems <br /> installed prior to January 1, 2001 shall be tested by January 1, 2003 and every 36 months <br /> thereafter. <br /> -> Secondary containment testing was due by February 20, 2004 for the UDC <br /> sumps, six months following installation. Testing was completed on March 27,2006. <br /> Title 23, CCR 2661 Permit to repair UST system. <br /> (a) Before repairing an underground storage tank system, the owner or operator shall <br /> comply with applicable requirements of Article 5. <br /> (b) Before repairing an underground storage tank system, the owner or operator shall <br /> demonstrate to the satisfaction of the local agency that the conditions and <br /> requirements specified in subsection 2660(k)will be met. When selecting a method of <br /> repair, the owner or operator shall take into consideration whether the cause of failure <br /> is isolated to the actual failure, is affecting other areas of the underground storage <br /> tank, or if any other cause of failure is affecting the primary container. <br /> 4 The turbine sumps failed secondary containment testing on March 23, 2003 and <br /> the facility was sold to Mr. Rizwan in this condition in January 2004. Mr. Rizwan <br /> was informed of the failures and the required repairs during the UST consultation. <br /> Mr. Rizwan was also instructed to provide the required repairs on the July 11, 2004 <br /> and August 19, 2004 inspection reports. The sumps were repaired sometime <br /> 9 <br />