Laserfiche WebLink
The following is an itemized list of underground storage tank violations that have not <br /> been addressed for VAN DE POL ENTERPRISES INC as of October fly, 2017. <br /> Open violations from January 31, 2017 inspection <br /> Violation#104-UST operating permit application for facility and tank information not submitted or current. <br /> UST Tank Information forms uploaded into CERS on 12-15-2016 for all three tanks are not current: <br /> 1)The 87-octane and the 91 octane tank forms incorrectly state that these tanks have double wall vent lines. <br /> 2)The diesel tank form incorrectly states that this tank has double wall vent and vapor recovery piping. Diesel tank <br /> has no vapor recovery lines. <br /> 3)All three tank forms indicate that there is a single wall vent piping transition sump, no transition sump is present <br /> onsite. <br /> 4)All three tank forms indicate that Under Dispenser Containment(UDC)is constructed of steel, the existing UDCs <br /> are constructed on fiberglass. <br /> 5)All three tank forms indicate that riser pipe secondary containment is steel, the onsite riser pipes are housed <br /> inside fiberglass sumps. <br /> Any change of information must be updated in CERS within 30 days of the changes. Immediately log into CERS, <br /> update the required information, and submit for review by the EHD. <br /> Violation#105-Failed to have an approved UST monitoring plan. <br /> The monitoring plan uploaded into CERS is not current and/or not approved by the EHD. The 87-octane line leak <br /> detector is listed incorrectly as a Red Jacket l The updated monitoring plan must be uploaded to the California <br /> Environmental Reporting System(CERS). Immediately log into CERS, make the necessary changes, and submit <br /> for review by the EHD. <br /> Violation#204-Current monitoring plan approved by the EHD not found on site. <br /> Current monitoring plan copy was not available onsite. A copy of these plans shall be accessible on site at all times. <br /> Immediately make appropriate monitoring plan corrections and retain a copy on site. <br /> Violation#206-Failure to comply with UST operating permit conditions. <br /> On September 20, 2016 San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department(EHD), approved the application for <br /> a permit to remove and install three Bravo conversion frames and new diesel and gasoline dispensers.According to <br /> Mr.Ted Shackerlford,the work was completed and should have been inspected by the EHD approximately"one <br /> month ago". No record of such inspection could be located. Please be aware that inspections for emergency work <br /> must be scheduled within five days of permit approval. Immediately schedule all pertinent field inspection(s) <br /> associated with this repair permit SR0075801. Submit proof of correction to the EHD. <br /> Violation#210-Designated operator monthly inspection reports not maintained on site for at least 12 <br /> months. <br /> The November 2016, December 2016, and January 2017 designated operator monthly inspection reports were not <br /> found on site. Designated operator monthly inspection reports for the previous twelve months shall be retained on <br /> site. Locate and ensure that copies of the previous twelve months of designated operator monthly inspection <br /> reports are maintained on site. Submit copies to the EHD. <br /> Violation#306-Monitoring equipment is not installed or maintained to detect a leak at the earliest <br /> opportunity. <br /> The following was noted at the time of inspection: <br /> 1)The UDC 3/4 sump sensor was raised approximately 2-3 inches off the lowest point of the sump, and was <br /> relocated to the lowest point at the time of inspection. <br /> 2) UDC 516 sensor was located toward the center of the sump and not located at the lowest point of the sump <br /> (accumulated liquid was observed around the perimeter of the sump and inside the sensor designated depression), <br /> and was relocated to the lowest point at the time of inspection. <br /> 3)87 STP sump sensor and the 91 STP sump sensor were located on the opposite side of their respective sumps <br /> (away from the product piping)and their cables were too short to have the sensors relocated to the lowest point. <br /> Monitoring equipment shall be maintained to be able to detect a leak at the earliest possible opportunity. The 87 <br /> and the 91 STP sump sensors couldn't be relocated due to the short power cords. Ensure that all monitoring <br /> equipment is maintained to detect a leak at the earliest opportunity. Submit proof of correction to the EHD. <br /> Page 1 of 3 <br />