INSTALL_2014 B100 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

_ _. _.... SIS San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department o• " "' • e DIRECTOR �'• '—"E` •'� Donna Heran,REHS 1868 East Hazelton Avenue Stockton, California 95205-6232 PROGRAM COORDINATORS Robert McClellan,REHS kf Jeff Carruesco,REHS,RDI C4L I....• a�P Website:www.sjgov,orglehd Kasey Foley,REHS FOR Linda Turkatle,REHS Phone: (209)468-3420 Rodney Es(rada,REHS Fax: (209)464-0138 Adrienne Ellsaesser, REHS October 9, 2013 MANTECA FIRE DEI'AUMs:RIT Wayne Gathright Cal Phase Constriction, Inc. 1775 Monterey Rd., Ste, 60-A " FI APPR0VED MJ d G')Mk (,I,)._____�___,,,_ San Jose, CA 95112 i AN I.7 ;'_.Y FIRE WA 'Al Re: Kaiser Hospital, 1777 W Yosemite Ave, Manteca, CA SR0067724 The San Joaquin County Environmental,Health Departure _ (EHD) has reviewed the permit application to remove the underground piping tee of the g erator/boiler F.O.R line, removelor abandon in plam.return piping associated with the above ound storage tank(AST),,repair the primary and the secondary piping where.the aforementio ed tee was removed, modify piping at the sump on the underground storage tank (.UST) sys m, and connect all the sensors to the existing TLS 350 Plus Veeder Root monitoring pan and recertify the system at the above referenced address. In order for this,permit application review to contin , an addendum and revised sheets for the plans must be submitted for the following deficlenc s: 1. Sheet number FO-G1, Cover Sheet, Si Plan, Notes R Maps, states "the pipe that .cannot be removed shall be tripled ed and abandonjedJ in place per the AHJ 1 Y instructions". Since sonV piping m b a do in Place permit {( needs to subtgd r' ob Ion on site. A copy of perm) pi o this atter. A licant shall also submit a'written approval fr }}y County Fire Prevention Bureau with jurisdiction allowing the Closure in Place ACIP) prior to the EHD permit approval. eat`n G ee to an, otes abs, sta es " emove a tee and as much of the associated pipe, that is associated with the generator day tank overflow, as possible." It is EHD's understanding that the proposed underground piping modification is to disconnect the return line leading from the boiler and not the one leading from the generator. Please provide clarification, and revise the above quoted statement to reflect the proposed scope of work, as appropriate, and submit a revised sheet number FO-G1 for EHD's review and approval. 3. Sheet number FO-M1.3, Modified Above Ground Fueling Piping Plan (F.O.S/F.O.R Connection), illustrates two supply lines ((E) F.O.C. from (E) UST) without a return line to the UST. Submit a revised sheet number FO-M1 with the required information.