My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO 2001-2010
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KETTLEMAN
>
420
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231906
>
COMPLIANCE INFO 2001-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/8/2021 1:08:13 PM
Creation date
11/5/2018 3:42:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2001-2010
RECORD_ID
PR0231906
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003776
FACILITY_NAME
KWIK SERV*
STREET_NUMBER
420
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
KETTLEMAN
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
06202042
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
420 W KETTLEMAN LN
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\K\KETTLEMAN\420\PR0231906\COMPLIANCE INFO 2001-2010.PDF
QuestysFileName
COMPLIANCE INFO 2001-2010
QuestysRecordDate
5/19/2017 11:33:18 PM
QuestysRecordID
3391364
QuestysRecordType
12
QuestysStateID
1
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
210
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 <br />D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br />Software version Installed. 17.1 <br />omolete the following ehackdsfr <br />0 <br />® Yes <br />❑ No' <br />Is the audible alarm operational? <br />® Yes <br />❑ No, <br />Is the visual alarm operational? <br />® Yes <br />❑ No' <br />Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? <br />® Yes <br />❑ No' <br />Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will not interfere with <br />operation? <br />❑ Yes <br />❑ No' <br />if alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, Is all communications equipment (e.g., modem) operational? <br />® N/A <br />® Yes <br />❑ No' <br />❑ N/A <br />For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment monitoring system de <br />fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate <br />, <br />positive shut -down? (Check all that apply) ®S <br />Sensors; ® Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br />Did you confirm positive shut -down due to leaks pnd sensor failure/disconnection? ® Yes; ❑ No. <br />❑ Yes <br />❑ No' <br />® N/A <br />For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e., no mechanical overfill prevent <br />installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible the tank fill <br />]�pacity <br />at <br />points) and operating properly? If so, at what percent oft tankdoes the alarm trigger?❑ <br />❑ No <br />Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced and list the manufa <br />and model for all replacement parts in Section E, below. <br />Yes <br />❑ No <br />Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) <br />Ves <br />❑ Product; ® Water. If yes, describe causes in Section E, below. <br />® Yes <br />❑ No' <br />Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set up reports, if applicable <br />® Yes <br />❑ No' <br />Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.