My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BILLING_2004-2007
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
4943
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0506488
>
BILLING_2004-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:50:42 PM
Creation date
11/5/2018 8:19:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
BILLING
FileName_PostFix
2004-2007
RECORD_ID
PR0506488
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0007458
FACILITY_NAME
7-ELEVEN INC #32190
STREET_NUMBER
4943
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
4943 S HWY 99
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\N\HWY 99\4943\PR0506488\BILLING 2004-2007.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Woring System Certification • <br />Site Address: 4943 S. KINGSLEY Date of Testing/Service: 01/17/2007 <br />MKT 2237 <br />D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br />Software Version Installed: 19.05 <br />Complete the following checklist: <br />X Yes <br />No • <br />Is the audible alarm operational? <br />❑X Yes <br />❑ No • <br />Is the visual alarm operational? <br />Q Yes <br />No • <br />Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? <br />FX]Yes <br />❑ No • <br />Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will not <br />interfere with their proper operation? <br />YesNo <br />• <br />x N/A <br />If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) operational? <br />x❑ Yes <br />❑ No • <br />❑ N/A <br />For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br />monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate positive <br />shut -down? (check all that apply) ❑x Sump/Trench Sensors; ❑X Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br />Did you confirm positive shut -down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? ❑X Yes No <br />❑ Yes <br />❑ No • <br />N/A <br />For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e.: no mechanical <br />overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill points(s) and operating <br />properly? If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alar trigger? <br />❑ Yes' <br />❑x No <br />Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced and list the <br />manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E, below. <br />FX]Yes* <br />❑ No <br />Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (check all that apply) ❑ Product; <br />0 Water. If yes, describe causes in Section E, below. <br />❑X Yes <br />❑ No • <br />Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set-up reports, if applicable. <br />x❑ Yes <br />❑ No • <br />Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturers'specifications? <br />In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiences were or will be corrected. <br />E. Comments: <br />SMALL AMOUNT OF WATER PUMPED OUT OF STP SUMP. <br />Page 2 of 3 Based on CA form dated 03/01 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.