Laserfiche WebLink
samples were non-detect for a compounds, including the eleven samples you witnessed <br /> being collected. The collection procedure was identical for sample UST3M-22 (and you were <br /> onsite later that same day after it was collected to witness the grouting of the wells) , <br /> and I would have no problem as the Professional Geologist of record on this sampling to <br /> testify to that in a court of law. <br /> with this new information, do you think it is still necessary to re-collect sample <br /> UST3M? <br /> Please advise. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Richard Vogl, PG, CHG, CEG <br /> Principal Hydrogeologist <br /> GeoHydrologic Consultants, Inc <br /> 5912 Bolsa Avenue, Suite 200 <br /> Huntington Beach, CA 92649 <br /> Phone (714) 898-5727 <br /> Fax (714) 898-5701 <br /> Cell (714) 615-0585 <br /> http://www.geohydrologic.com <http://www.geohydrologic.com/> <br /> 2 <br />