Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br /> Vicki McCartney [EH] <br /> From: Vicki McCartney [EH] <br /> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2416 12:21 PM <br /> To: 'Sharlene Woods' <br /> Subject: RE: Fast Lane Central Valley Update <br /> Attachments: 116 Roth Rd.pdf <br /> Hello Sharlene, <br /> I have reviewed information submitted by you in an email attachment dated October 20,2016. Fallowing are comments <br /> concerning violations reported during the monitoring system certification inspections completed at Fast Lane Central <br /> Valley at 116 E. Roth Road, Lathrop, CA. <br /> As explained in the 9/8/2016 and 9/15/2016 amended inspection reports, the San Joaquin County Environmental Health <br /> Department (EHD) "accepted" submittals to California Environmental Reporting System (CERS)on July 21, 2016; this <br /> means that the submittals were received at the EHD, much like receiving mail from the US Postal Service. It means <br /> nothing more than that. To date, none of the information submitted to CERS on 7/18/16 has addressed the violations <br /> reported in the 9/8/16 and 9/15/16 amended inspection reports. <br /> Item 103: 1 have appended instructions for completing the Certification of Financial Responsibility. Remove the `X'from <br /> 500,000 dollars per occurrence and add "yes" to ThirdParty Comp. Please make the necessary revisions and submit to <br /> CERS. <br /> Item 104: As explained above, "accepted" means that the EHD has received the information; it does not mean that the <br /> information is correct. I have appended information showing that the Board of Equalization (BOE) number in CERS is not <br /> valid.The BOE contact information has been included. Contact the BOE and get a valid BOE number. None of the UST <br /> tank information in CERS has been corrected. See the attachments for further clarification. <br /> Item 105: This,too, has not been corrected in CERS. See the attachment for guidance in correcting the information <br /> concerning the monitoring plan. <br /> Item 107 (formerly Item 106): Please submit a plot plan showing where monitoring will take place on both the auto and <br /> truck sides of the facility. An example of a site plan has been appended. <br /> Item 201: "Log book contains records beginning 9/20/2016" does not address the L11 and L22 alarms noted in the <br /> inspection report. <br /> Item 203: The EHD has not received the documents yet concerning this violation. <br /> Item 204: Once the monitoring plan has been revised in CERS, print and retain a copy of the revised monitoring plan on <br /> site. <br /> Item 209 (Formerly Item 207): You have discussed this violation with the designated operator(DO) and you need to <br /> make sure that all alarms are addressed by the DO going forth. <br /> Item 304:This was corrected on site as you have indicated. <br /> Item 313/319: Although the liquid was removed from the spill containers during the June 16-17, 2016 testing, liquid was <br /> found in the spill containers during the 8/8/16. What is being done to prevent this from occurring in the future? <br /> Item 316: Although the liquid was removed from the sumps and under dispenser containments by the service <br /> technicians during the June 16 and 17, 2016 testing and the August 8, 2016 testing, what is being done to prevent this <br /> from occurring in the future? <br />