My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0002753
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARDING
>
16
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0508502
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0002753
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/7/2018 9:35:56 AM
Creation date
11/6/2018 3:39:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0002753
RECORD_ID
PR0508502
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0008117
FACILITY_NAME
ARCO STATION #4932
STREET_NUMBER
16
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HARDING
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
13902001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
16 E HARDING WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> Atlantic Richfield Company 4 <br /> ' ARCO Service Station 4912.16 East Harding Way,Stockton,CA - May10.2061 <br /> . MPE Mass Removal Rates <br /> ' The total mass of TPHg, benzene, and MTBE removed during the test were calculated <br /> using the influent air analytical results, an average flow rate, and the time of the test <br /> The calculated TPHg, benzene, and MtBE mass removed during the MPE test was <br /> ' approximately 544 3 pounds, 19 5 pounds, and 440 pounds, respectively (Table 6) <br /> Vapor Extraction Radius of Influence <br /> ' The maximum radius of influence for each extraction well was estimated based on the <br /> observation well vacuum data, assuming a semi-logarithmic relationship between <br /> ' vacuum influence and distance from the source well The minimum vacuum influence <br /> for effective MPE was set at 0 1 inches of water column Assuming a fully confined <br /> radial gas flow system, the following equation was used to estimate the radius of <br /> influence <br /> P2 _P2 _ P2 P2 ln(rl RW) <br /> ' r w — ( Rl — W ln(RI /Rx,) <br /> ' Where <br /> Pr = pressure at a radial distance r from the vapor extraction well <br /> PW = pressure at the vapor extraction well <br /> '• PRI = pressure at the radius of influence <br /> r = radial distance from the vapor extraction well <br /> RI =radius of influence where pressure is equal to a preset value <br /> ' RW = well radius of the vapor extraction well <br /> ' Solving for R1 in the above equation yields an estimate of the radius of influence and <br /> was used to calculate the radius of influence for each extraction well The maximum <br /> applied vacuum and flow rates were used to calculate the radius of influence for each <br /> ' well Calculated radii of influence are included in Tables 2 through 4 <br /> I <br /> I <br /> r'0 <br /> ' ARCO 4932/WE test doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.