My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2002 - 2004
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WEST
>
4040
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231963
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2002 - 2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/23/2019 3:04:48 PM
Creation date
11/7/2018 10:05:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2002 - 2004
RECORD_ID
PR0231963
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0006445
FACILITY_NAME
PG&E: Stockton Service Center
STREET_NUMBER
4040
STREET_NAME
WEST
STREET_TYPE
Ln
City
Stockton
Zip
95204
APN
117-020-01
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
4040 West Ln
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\W\WEST\4040\PR0231963\COMPLIANCE INFO 2002 - 2004 .PDF
QuestysFileName
COMPLIANCE INFO 2002 - 2004
QuestysRecordDate
7/26/2018 10:41:38 PM
QuestysRecordID
3948516
QuestysRecordType
12
QuestysStateID
1
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1-04-202 8.26AM FROM SACRAMENTO EMC 9169252816 P- 3 <br /> Sacramento Equipment Nlaintenance Company, Inc Work Order# 106645 <br /> Site Address: PGF-094-Stockton Service Center Date of Testing/Servicing: 11/01/01 <br /> 4040 West Lane-Stockton <br /> D- Results of Testing/Servicing: <br /> Software Version Installed: T�a <br /> Yes No N/A Complete the following checklist: <br /> ✓ Is the audible alarm operational? <br /> Is the visual alarm operational? <br /> Were all sensors visually inspected,functionally tested, and firmed operational? <br /> ✓ Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br /> not interfere with their proper operation? <br /> If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station,is all communications equipment(e.g- modem) <br /> operational? <br /> ✓ For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the pipping secondary containment <br /> monitoring System detects a leak,fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate <br /> positive shutdown? (Check all that apply) <br /> Sump/Trench: Dispenser Containment Sensors <br /> Did you confirm positive shutdown due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? Yes No <br /> ✓ For tanks systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device(i.e. no <br /> mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed),is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br /> fill point(s)and operating properly? If so,at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? % <br /> sm <br /> Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors,probes or other equipment replaced <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E below. <br /> ./ Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) <br /> Product Water If yes, describe causes in Section E below. <br /> Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? <br /> ✓ Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br /> (A ioye s ad d be zcs need to de c btr ►4w.,&nd shed these defipiencxes were�;rel con ttted in Se don 'below} <br /> E. Comments: <br /> 03/01 ouray oc�ooiracwu2-momQc.. d Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.