My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2002 - 2004
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WEST
>
4040
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231963
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2002 - 2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/23/2019 3:04:48 PM
Creation date
11/7/2018 10:05:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2002 - 2004
RECORD_ID
PR0231963
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0006445
FACILITY_NAME
PG&E: Stockton Service Center
STREET_NUMBER
4040
STREET_NAME
WEST
STREET_TYPE
Ln
City
Stockton
Zip
95204
APN
117-020-01
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
4040 West Ln
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\W\WEST\4040\PR0231963\COMPLIANCE INFO 2002 - 2004 .PDF
QuestysFileName
COMPLIANCE INFO 2002 - 2004
QuestysRecordDate
7/26/2018 10:41:38 PM
QuestysRecordID
3948516
QuestysRecordType
12
QuestysStateID
1
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A Res'uIts of Testing/Servicing t j <br /> Software Version Installed: <br /> Complete the followincy checklist: <br /> �d Yes ❑ No* Is the audible alarm operational? t, <br /> Yes l2 No* Is the visual alarm operational? <br /> pa Yes ❑ No* Were aII sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? F <br /> QYes ❑ No*. Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br /> not interfere with their proper operation? `r <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modern) <br /> ,l NIA operational? _ > <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> t3 NIA monitoring system detects a leak,'fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? if yes: which sensors initiate <br /> positive shut-down? (Check all that apply) ❑ Sump/Trench Sensors; ❑ Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confnm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? ❑ Yes; ❑No. <br /> M Yes ❑ No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no <br /> .NIA mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br /> fill point(s)and operating properly? If so,at what ercent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? % <br /> ❑ Yes* Gi No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes,.or other equipment replaced <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all re lacement parts in Section E,below. <br /> ❑ Yes* 6 No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) ❑ <br /> Product; ❑ Water. If yes, describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> Yes ❑ No* Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings?Attach set up re orfs,if applicable <br /> JO Yes ❑ No Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br /> * In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: _ fy►ac �1 -tt- >t Cs-, 1A;��, <br /> Page 2 of 3 03101 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.