My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2016 - 2017
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
824
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231459
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2016 - 2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2023 11:18:41 AM
Creation date
11/7/2018 12:27:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2016 - 2017
RECORD_ID
PR0231459
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003677
FACILITY_NAME
DIAMOND GAS AND FOOD MART
STREET_NUMBER
824
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
22118003
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
824 E YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\Y\YOSEMITE\824\PR0231459\COMPLIANCE INFO 2016 - PRESENT .PDF
QuestysFileName
COMPLIANCE INFO 2016 - PRESENT
QuestysRecordDate
2/21/2017 5:37:44 PM
QuestysRecordID
3341592
QuestysRecordType
12
QuestysStateID
1
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> RECER*® - <br /> Software version installed: 329.01 SEP 3 0 2016 <br /> Complete the following checklist: <br /> ® Yes ❑ No• Is the audible alarm operational? hNVIRONMENTAi <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Is the visual alarm operational? <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors visually inspected,functionally tested,and confirme op t,b a <br /> ENT <br /> ® Yes ❑ No' Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will not interfere with their proper <br /> operation? <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station,is all communications equipment(e.g.,modem)operational? <br /> ® N/A <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* For pressurized piping systems,does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment monitoring system detects a leak, <br /> ❑ N/A fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate positive shut-doom? (Check all that apply) ® Sump french <br /> Sensors; ®Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failureldisconnection? ®Yes; ❑No. <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device(i.e., no mechanical overfill prevention valve is <br /> ® N/A installed),is the overfill waming alarm visible and audible at the tank fill points)and operating properly? If so,at what percent of tank capacity <br /> does the alarm trigger? <br /> ❑ Yes ® No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes,identify specific sensors,probes,or other equipment replaced and list the manufacturer name <br /> and model for all replacement parts in Section E,below. <br /> ❑Yes• ® No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) <br /> ❑Product; ❑Water. If yes,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings?Attach set up reports,if applicable <br /> ® Yes ❑ No' Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br /> •In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: <br /> Y <br /> Monitoring System Certification Page 2 of 4 2/21/()7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.